Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: naturalman1975

Does not the Queen herself actually have the power to control succession?


59 posted on 04/29/2011 6:06:55 AM PDT by djf (Dems and liberals: Let's redefine "marriage". We already redefined "natural born citizen".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]


To: djf
Does not the Queen herself actually have the power to control succession?

No. It's in the control of Parliament - laid down in Acts of Parliament. The most important of these is the Act of Settlement of 1701, but the Act of Union of 1800, and His Majesty's Declaration of Abdication Act 1936 (this last is now irrelevant, as Edward VIII/the Duke of Windsor died without heirs but it reflects the fact that even when a King abdicated, Parliament had to alter the succession because the King could not do so himself).

63 posted on 04/29/2011 6:11:52 AM PDT by naturalman1975 ("America was under attack. Australia was immediately there to help." - John Winston Howard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

To: djf

There’s been chatter for years (search engine: charles skipped in royal succession) that Charles would not be acceptable as King.

He’s an outspoken politically (alienating half of Parliament), was divorced, has a controversial business empire, and may have converted to Islam.

The Queen has informal influence, but only Parliament can make the decision.


69 posted on 04/29/2011 6:28:37 AM PDT by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson