Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

247 On U.S. Terror Watch List Bought Guns In 2010
ABC News ^

Posted on 04/28/2011 1:20:34 PM PDT by Sub-Driver

247 On U.S. Terror Watch List Bought Guns In 2010

By JASON RYAN April 28, 2011

More than 200 individuals who were on the federal terrorism watch list passed background checks and were allowed to buy guns in 2010, according to a new government review.

A review by the Government Accountability Office determined that 247 people on the watch list bought guns last year, and also showed that between 2004 and 2009, more than nine out of ten individuals on the list who tried to buy guns succeeded.

"It defies common sense," said Sen. Lautenberg, D.-New Jersey, who requested the GAO report, "that people on the terror watch list continue to be cleared to buy weapons legally in the United States."

Current federal law does not prohibit people on the terrorist watch lists from purchasing guns unless there is a prohibiting factor, such as being a fugitive, a felon, renouncing U.S. citizenship or suffering mental impairment. Sen. Lautenberg has introduced legislation that would close this loophole and prevent known or suspected terrorists from purchasing firearms.

(Excerpt) Read more at abcnews.go.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 112th; banglist; congress; democrats; govtabuse; guncontrol; lautenberg; liberalfascism; terroristwatchlist; terrorwatchlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

1 posted on 04/28/2011 1:20:37 PM PDT by Sub-Driver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

bump!


2 posted on 04/28/2011 1:22:16 PM PDT by Mr. Silverback (Anyone who says we need illegals to do the jobs Americans won't do has never watched "Dirty Jobs.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar; NorwegianViking; ExTexasRedhead; HollyB; FromLori; EricTheRed_VocalMinority; ...

The list, ping

Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list

http://www.nachumlist.com/


3 posted on 04/28/2011 1:23:58 PM PDT by Nachum (The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

I would sooner arm those on “the terror watch list” than I ever would the lowlife dems.


4 posted on 04/28/2011 1:25:28 PM PDT by Gator113 ("GAME ON." I'll be voting for Sarah Palin, Liberty, our Constitution and American Exceptionalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Terror wacth list is not a conviction so you can not restrict their rights.


5 posted on 04/28/2011 1:30:26 PM PDT by Ratman83
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

It’s funny. Libs are always screaming about the rights of the accused. What about the rights of those who have not have even been accused? It’s a proven and know fact that the terrorist watch list is a joke. Are the Tyranical Left saying that our Constitutionaly protected rights are subject to prior restraint?


6 posted on 04/28/2011 1:30:57 PM PDT by Drill Thrawl (I can haz CW2 now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Does that include Constitutional terrorists? I’d have thought the number to have been much higher.


7 posted on 04/28/2011 1:31:33 PM PDT by Rebelbase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

“Current federal law does not prohibit people on the terrorist watch lists from purchasing guns unless there is a prohibiting factor, such as being a fugitive, a felon, renouncing U.S. citizenship or suffering mental impairment. Sen. Lautenberg has introduced legislation that would close this loophole and prevent known or suspected terrorists from purchasing firearms.”

That couldn’t possibly be abused to disarm patriotic Americans who disagree with the administration. No way. /sarc


8 posted on 04/28/2011 1:32:16 PM PDT by FiscalSanity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

So? You can be on the list with no trial, no indictment, no court order, no reasonable cause. Rights don’t just disappear because the government arbitrarily put you on some list.


9 posted on 04/28/2011 1:33:01 PM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: antiRepublicrat

“So? You can be on the list with no trial, no indictment, no court order, no reasonable cause. Rights don’t just disappear because the government arbitrarily put you on some list.”

That’s what life in the land of the free looks like these days.


10 posted on 04/28/2011 1:39:58 PM PDT by WKUHilltopper (Fix bayonets!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Big deal. Esp. considering that apparently you can get on ‘the list’ for just having the wrong name.

IF there isn’t enough evidence to arrest them, then there isn’t enough evidence to keep them from buying a gun.


11 posted on 04/28/2011 1:41:08 PM PDT by Little Ray (The Gods of the Copybook Heading, with terror and slaughter return!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Um. Not so sure this is the thread to bring up the “do you want to be on the list” thing! ;)


12 posted on 04/28/2011 1:41:11 PM PDT by 21twelve ( You can go from boom to bust, from dreams to a bowl of dust ... another lost generation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Hey Frank, FRANK. Your Buddy Ted Kennedy was on the Terror Watch List.

Perhaps there's just a problem with the list. FRANK

13 posted on 04/28/2011 1:45:25 PM PDT by Falcon4.0
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drill Thrawl

“........Are the Tyranical Left saying that our Constitutionaly protected rights are subject to prior restraint?”

These ARE the same people that put in place mind reading legislation that determine what a person was thinking while, or prior to perpetrating a crime as a guideline for sentencing, so I wouldn’t put it past them.


14 posted on 04/28/2011 1:47:05 PM PDT by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists, call 'em what you will, they ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

The loophole here is that A-holes like Lautenberg are permitted to know that intelligence lists even exist. The last thing America needs is for one’s inclusion on a “secret government list” to be grounds to restrict their rights. If there is actionable intelligence, then it should be acted on. However, it appears that they simply want to regulate away the rights of anyone they don’t agree with. The odor is overwhelming and the timidity of the GOP is deafening.


15 posted on 04/28/2011 2:06:17 PM PDT by Steamburg (The contents of your wallet is the only language Politicians understand.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

more propaganda intended to support a system where your name will get electronically flashed to Big Sis’ desk whenever you go to buy a gun. (especially true when THEY control who is on the Terror Watch List)


16 posted on 04/28/2011 2:10:13 PM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
More than 200 individuals who were on the federal terrorism watch list passed background checks and were allowed to buy guns in 2010, according to a new government review.

Must have had phony Hawaiian birth certificates.

17 posted on 04/28/2011 2:28:16 PM PDT by archy (I'd give my right arm to be ambidextrous!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback

Of course, it’s up to Big Sis to say who should be on the watch list. Doesn’t THAT sound like fun!!! A big 2nd amendment supporter—you’re a presumptive DOMESTIC TERRORIST, don’t you know!!! I’ll guarantee the left would abuse the HELL out of its power to prevent the right to keep and bear arms under this terror watch list nonsense.


18 posted on 04/28/2011 2:37:16 PM PDT by Oldpuppymax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

It certainly “defies common sense” (and legal sense, too ), the Senator holds office at all......Since he got put on the ballot in contravention of NJ election law.....

Recall the Senator was the author of the Lautenberg Law which retroactively upgraded old misdemeanor convictions to felonies with disasterous impact upon affected individuals numbering in the thousands ! Now he’s planning on disenfranchising unknown thousands more (no one knows who/how many are on “secret government list(s)”), sans any adjudication. But, the Senator’s paranoia consistently runs that way .... >PS


19 posted on 04/28/2011 2:50:18 PM PDT by PiperShade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

How many were through the ATF’s Gunwalker program?


20 posted on 04/28/2011 3:48:28 PM PDT by Sarisky (Surely you can't be serious......yes I am...... and don't call me Shirley)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson