Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Religion Moderator

This is ascribing motive, the post 405 says “your overriding tendency is to treat them as monolithic” —> and besides attempting to ascribe motive, it is being personal. Instead of focussing on the issue, the post is ascribing motive


410 posted on 05/05/2011 9:21:57 AM PDT by Cronos (Libspeak: "Yes there is proof. And no, for the sake of privacy I am not posting it here.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 409 | View Replies ]


To: Cronos
No, he is criticizing your argument, i.e. expressing his own mind.

For instance, if I said "that's a strawman argument" or "you're arguing against something that doesn't exist" or "you're treating my denomination as if it were a cult" - none would be attributing motive or mind reading. They would be expressing my own mind, judging your posts not you.

But if I said "you are just saying that to make me mad" or "you're making a strawman argument to change the subject because you have no real defense for that" or "you believe my denomination is a cult" - any would be attributing motive and/or mind reading.

411 posted on 05/05/2011 9:33:50 AM PDT by Religion Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 410 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson