Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GLOCK Celebrates 25 Years in the United States with 2,500 Limited-Edition Pistols
ammoland.com ^ | 27 April, 2011 | Glock

Posted on 04/28/2011 5:01:06 AM PDT by marktwain

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last
To: Celtic Conservative
You gotta be smarter than your gun, plain and simple.

So THAT's why liberals don't like guns!

21 posted on 04/28/2011 10:11:43 AM PDT by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Red in Blue PA

I have over 10,000 rounds through my G17 qo ever a jam.

Probably 7500 through a G26 w/o a problem either.


22 posted on 04/28/2011 10:49:17 AM PDT by GlockThe Vote (F U B O ! ! !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: andy58-in-nh
Follow the Golden Rules

Needing to Pull the trigger to do a take down violates one of the 4 rules!!!!
23 posted on 04/28/2011 11:36:15 AM PDT by Red in Blue PA (Let's apply the "reasonable man" standard to gun laws. How many would stand?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Bump for later viewing of the anti-Glock dopes.


24 posted on 04/28/2011 11:41:48 AM PDT by facedown (Armed in the Heartland)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]



Eating your fill of all the news and commentary?
Haven't donated yet?

Give what you can
Or sign up to donate monthly
and a sponsoring FReeper will contribute $10

Lazamataz is hanging in the balance!

25 posted on 04/28/2011 11:45:46 AM PDT by TheOldLady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: thackney

Sorry, but having to pull the trigger in order to perform a take down violates on of the 4 rules.

That’s simply a fact!


26 posted on 04/28/2011 11:49:19 AM PDT by Red in Blue PA (Let's apply the "reasonable man" standard to gun laws. How many would stand?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Red in Blue PA
So by that definition, gunsmiths cannot ever pull a trigger unless on the firing range.

At the point you have decided to take the gun apart, you need to start by making sure it is unloaded.

Again, if one is unwilling to engage the safety located between their ears, it is unlikely they will correctly use any other mechanical safety.

27 posted on 04/28/2011 11:56:05 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer (biblein90days.org))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: andy58-in-nh

Agree.

While some may like the absence of a safety, I think that it is advisable unless one is in the mountains of Afghainstan. Walking down the grocery aisle at the supermarket, I want at least one safety.....call me crazy.


28 posted on 04/28/2011 11:56:39 AM PDT by Red in Blue PA (Let's apply the "reasonable man" standard to gun laws. How many would stand?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Why would you design a gun which necessitates the pulling of the trigger for anything other than shooting? It makes absolutely no sense to me.

If you sell 1 million guns, guaranteed that statistically 20 or so will take down the gun negligently.

It is a design looking for trouble.

Only someone who knowlingly ignores some of the 4 rules could be in favor of it.


29 posted on 04/28/2011 12:07:07 PM PDT by Red in Blue PA (Let's apply the "reasonable man" standard to gun laws. How many would stand?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Red in Blue PA
I believe I would be more likely to forget a safety during the rush of a gun battle than performing maintenance.

The only ones that will get hurt by their design during this function are those willing to disassemble a weapon while it is still loaded.

It isn't for everyone, and I didn't like it at first. But I have become used to it and happy with it.

Some people are better off without that feature; I could suggest knitting for those but they might hurt themselves with the pointy sticks.

30 posted on 04/28/2011 12:17:39 PM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer (biblein90days.org))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Red in Blue PA
Needing to Pull the trigger to do a take down violates one of the 4 rules!!!!,

Yeah: technically, that's true. But consider that if you've conscientiously taken the other procedural steps, including the one of pointing the gun away from anything you wouldn't want to destroy, it's an acceptable and safe exception (such as dry-firing). Another thing you can add to the "ritual" of cleaning and disassembly (and that's how I prefer to think of it) is to verify the negative status of any loaded-chamber indicator your pistol has. Some use a white dot, others a colored flange, etc. but it's a smart thing to do as well.

31 posted on 04/28/2011 12:19:43 PM PDT by andy58-in-nh (America does not need to be organized: it needs to be liberated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Red in Blue PA

Since the gun I learned to shoot with as a child had a similiar feature, I guess I just don't see it as strange. It is not a Glock only design and applies to different types of firearms and has for decades.

http://www.marlinfirearms.com/pdfs/manuals/MFC_Bolt_Action_RF.pdf

32 posted on 04/28/2011 12:25:27 PM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer (biblein90days.org))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: thackney

If I told people, even in the gun community, that I carried a 1911 in Condition 0, they would say I am crazy and asking for trouble.

That is basically how a Glock is carried.

Not my cup of tea.....that’s all I am saying.


33 posted on 04/28/2011 12:28:58 PM PDT by Red in Blue PA (Let's apply the "reasonable man" standard to gun laws. How many would stand?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Red in Blue PA

I tend to agree. I don’t think you should use a Glock either.

Cheers.


34 posted on 04/28/2011 12:34:08 PM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer (biblein90days.org))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Red in Blue PA
That's right. To me, the purpose of an external safety is to allow for the concealed carry of a pistol in a dependable and ready state for extraction and firing. You do not want to depend for your protection on a gun without a round in the chamber - in a critical adrenaline-pumping fight-or-flight situation, the time and effort required to rack a slide (will it jam?), front sight acquire, rear site align and fire could easily get you killed, especially if your adversary has a gun of his own. A simple thumb safety is intuitive and quickly disengaged with practice (and practice drawing a lot if you carry).
35 posted on 04/28/2011 12:34:47 PM PDT by andy58-in-nh (America does not need to be organized: it needs to be liberated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Red in Blue PA
Walking down the grocery aisle at the supermarket, I want at least one safety.....call me crazy.

OK, then don't carry a revolver.

36 posted on 04/28/2011 12:55:16 PM PDT by facedown (Armed in the Heartland)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: facedown
OK, then don't carry a revolver.

Correct me if I am wrong, but one can have the hammer back.....or not.
37 posted on 04/28/2011 6:12:00 PM PDT by Red in Blue PA (Let's apply the "reasonable man" standard to gun laws. How many would stand?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson