Skip to comments.
GLOCK Celebrates 25 Years in the United States with 2,500 Limited-Edition Pistols
ammoland.com ^
| 27 April, 2011
| Glock
Posted on 04/28/2011 5:01:06 AM PDT by marktwain
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-37 last
To: Celtic Conservative
You gotta be smarter than your gun, plain and simple. So THAT's why liberals don't like guns!
21
posted on
04/28/2011 10:11:43 AM PDT
by
Still Thinking
(Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
To: Red in Blue PA
I have over 10,000 rounds through my G17 qo ever a jam.
Probably 7500 through a G26 w/o a problem either.
To: andy58-in-nh
Follow the Golden Rules
Needing to Pull the trigger to do a take down violates one of the 4 rules!!!!
23
posted on
04/28/2011 11:36:15 AM PDT
by
Red in Blue PA
(Let's apply the "reasonable man" standard to gun laws. How many would stand?)
To: marktwain
Bump for later viewing of the anti-Glock dopes.
24
posted on
04/28/2011 11:41:48 AM PDT
by
facedown
(Armed in the Heartland)
To: thackney
Sorry, but having to pull the trigger in order to perform a take down violates on of the 4 rules.
That’s simply a fact!
26
posted on
04/28/2011 11:49:19 AM PDT
by
Red in Blue PA
(Let's apply the "reasonable man" standard to gun laws. How many would stand?)
To: Red in Blue PA
So by that definition, gunsmiths cannot ever pull a trigger unless on the firing range.
At the point you have decided to take the gun apart, you need to start by making sure it is unloaded.
Again, if one is unwilling to engage the safety located between their ears, it is unlikely they will correctly use any other mechanical safety.
27
posted on
04/28/2011 11:56:05 AM PDT
by
thackney
(life is fragile, handle with prayer (biblein90days.org))
To: andy58-in-nh
Agree.
While some may like the absence of a safety, I think that it is advisable unless one is in the mountains of Afghainstan. Walking down the grocery aisle at the supermarket, I want at least one safety.....call me crazy.
28
posted on
04/28/2011 11:56:39 AM PDT
by
Red in Blue PA
(Let's apply the "reasonable man" standard to gun laws. How many would stand?)
To: thackney
Why would you design a gun which necessitates the pulling of the trigger for anything other than shooting? It makes absolutely no sense to me.
If you sell 1 million guns, guaranteed that statistically 20 or so will take down the gun negligently.
It is a design looking for trouble.
Only someone who knowlingly ignores some of the 4 rules could be in favor of it.
29
posted on
04/28/2011 12:07:07 PM PDT
by
Red in Blue PA
(Let's apply the "reasonable man" standard to gun laws. How many would stand?)
To: Red in Blue PA
I believe I would be more likely to forget a safety during the rush of a gun battle than performing maintenance.
The only ones that will get hurt by their design during this function are those willing to disassemble a weapon while it is still loaded.
It isn't for everyone, and I didn't like it at first. But I have become used to it and happy with it.
Some people are better off without that feature; I could suggest knitting for those but they might hurt themselves with the pointy sticks.
30
posted on
04/28/2011 12:17:39 PM PDT
by
thackney
(life is fragile, handle with prayer (biblein90days.org))
To: Red in Blue PA
Needing to Pull the trigger to do a take down violates one of the 4 rules!!!!, Yeah: technically, that's true. But consider that if you've conscientiously taken the other procedural steps, including the one of pointing the gun away from anything you wouldn't want to destroy, it's an acceptable and safe exception (such as dry-firing). Another thing you can add to the "ritual" of cleaning and disassembly (and that's how I prefer to think of it) is to verify the negative status of any loaded-chamber indicator your pistol has. Some use a white dot, others a colored flange, etc. but it's a smart thing to do as well.
31
posted on
04/28/2011 12:19:43 PM PDT
by
andy58-in-nh
(America does not need to be organized: it needs to be liberated.)
To: Red in Blue PA
32
posted on
04/28/2011 12:25:27 PM PDT
by
thackney
(life is fragile, handle with prayer (biblein90days.org))
To: thackney
If I told people, even in the gun community, that I carried a 1911 in Condition 0, they would say I am crazy and asking for trouble.
That is basically how a Glock is carried.
Not my cup of tea.....that’s all I am saying.
33
posted on
04/28/2011 12:28:58 PM PDT
by
Red in Blue PA
(Let's apply the "reasonable man" standard to gun laws. How many would stand?)
To: Red in Blue PA
I tend to agree. I don’t think you should use a Glock either.
Cheers.
34
posted on
04/28/2011 12:34:08 PM PDT
by
thackney
(life is fragile, handle with prayer (biblein90days.org))
To: Red in Blue PA
That's right. To me, the purpose of an external safety is to allow for the concealed carry of a pistol in a dependable and ready state for extraction and firing. You do not want to depend for your protection on a gun without a round in the chamber - in a critical adrenaline-pumping fight-or-flight situation, the time and effort required to rack a slide (will it jam?), front sight acquire, rear site align and fire could easily get you killed, especially if your adversary has a gun of his own. A simple thumb safety is intuitive and quickly disengaged with practice (and practice drawing a lot if you carry).
35
posted on
04/28/2011 12:34:47 PM PDT
by
andy58-in-nh
(America does not need to be organized: it needs to be liberated.)
To: Red in Blue PA
Walking down the grocery aisle at the supermarket, I want at least one safety.....call me crazy.OK, then don't carry a revolver.
36
posted on
04/28/2011 12:55:16 PM PDT
by
facedown
(Armed in the Heartland)
To: facedown
OK, then don't carry a revolver.
Correct me if I am wrong, but one can have the hammer back.....or not.
37
posted on
04/28/2011 6:12:00 PM PDT
by
Red in Blue PA
(Let's apply the "reasonable man" standard to gun laws. How many would stand?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-37 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson