Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: thackney

Why would you design a gun which necessitates the pulling of the trigger for anything other than shooting? It makes absolutely no sense to me.

If you sell 1 million guns, guaranteed that statistically 20 or so will take down the gun negligently.

It is a design looking for trouble.

Only someone who knowlingly ignores some of the 4 rules could be in favor of it.


29 posted on 04/28/2011 12:07:07 PM PDT by Red in Blue PA (Let's apply the "reasonable man" standard to gun laws. How many would stand?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: Red in Blue PA
I believe I would be more likely to forget a safety during the rush of a gun battle than performing maintenance.

The only ones that will get hurt by their design during this function are those willing to disassemble a weapon while it is still loaded.

It isn't for everyone, and I didn't like it at first. But I have become used to it and happy with it.

Some people are better off without that feature; I could suggest knitting for those but they might hurt themselves with the pointy sticks.

30 posted on 04/28/2011 12:17:39 PM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer (biblein90days.org))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

To: Red in Blue PA

Since the gun I learned to shoot with as a child had a similiar feature, I guess I just don't see it as strange. It is not a Glock only design and applies to different types of firearms and has for decades.

http://www.marlinfirearms.com/pdfs/manuals/MFC_Bolt_Action_RF.pdf

32 posted on 04/28/2011 12:25:27 PM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer (biblein90days.org))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson