To: andy58-in-nh
Agree.
While some may like the absence of a safety, I think that it is advisable unless one is in the mountains of Afghainstan. Walking down the grocery aisle at the supermarket, I want at least one safety.....call me crazy.
28 posted on
04/28/2011 11:56:39 AM PDT by
Red in Blue PA
(Let's apply the "reasonable man" standard to gun laws. How many would stand?)
To: Red in Blue PA
That's right. To me, the purpose of an external safety is to allow for the concealed carry of a pistol in a dependable and ready state for extraction and firing. You do not want to depend for your protection on a gun without a round in the chamber - in a critical adrenaline-pumping fight-or-flight situation, the time and effort required to rack a slide (will it jam?), front sight acquire, rear site align and fire could easily get you killed, especially if your adversary has a gun of his own. A simple thumb safety is intuitive and quickly disengaged with practice (and practice drawing a lot if you carry).
35 posted on
04/28/2011 12:34:47 PM PDT by
andy58-in-nh
(America does not need to be organized: it needs to be liberated.)
To: Red in Blue PA
Walking down the grocery aisle at the supermarket, I want at least one safety.....call me crazy.OK, then don't carry a revolver.
36 posted on
04/28/2011 12:55:16 PM PDT by
facedown
(Armed in the Heartland)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson