No, it’s not. The “date filed” is 3 days before the Nordyke BC’s “date filed” but the BC# is higher/later than theirs.
This BC# is most probably the BC# for a little girl who was born on Aug 4, died on Aug 5, is in the HDOH birth and death index for 1960-64 BUT FOR WHOM THE HDOH CLAIMS THEY HAVE NO RECORDS.
IOW, her name was on the record when they printed out the birth index, but it’s not on that record any more. Three guesses as to whose name is now on that record with that BC#.
I’ve been saying all along that the only way we will know whether ANYTHING from the HDOH or any government office is genuine is by looking at the embedded transaction logs to see if this BC# was just recently changed from this little girl’s name to Obama’s name.
Him producing this document now fits everything I’ve been saying. Fukino gave the interview to Isikoff because they had the forgery done and in their office. Still doesn’t match her statement that it was half typed, half printed - so it doesn’t fit Abercrombie’s statement that it was “actually written down in the archives”.
None of the stories match up. This image is half from the photocopier (note the side edges) and half on security paper. It’s half certified (has Onaka’s stamp on it) and half not certified (no seal). It’s half Ann Obama and half Stanley Dunham. No father’s signature.
Yeah things don’t fit. It would be very difficult to prove forgery with the state of Hawaii sponsoring it.