He rails against PORK, yet he loads up Bills, he know will pass, with his own pet projects, then votes against them, so he can claim that he doesn't "like" PORK.
Ron Paul's candidcy isn't "good" for anything! He added nothing to the debates, last time around, except the GOP's version of Denis Kucinich.
Alright, this is answering the question I asked. I'm hoping for specifics though - do you have an article or a link going into detail on this?
Ron Paul's candidacy isn't "good" for anything!
Ron Paul's candidacy is good for getting the spotlight on shady business at the 'Federal' Reserve, you'd have to admit. No?