Alright, this is answering the question I asked. I'm hoping for specifics though - do you have an article or a link going into detail on this?
Ron Paul's candidacy isn't "good" for anything!
Ron Paul's candidacy is good for getting the spotlight on shady business at the 'Federal' Reserve, you'd have to admit. No?
He keeps doing it, so perhaps if you look for threads about him, some will pop up, as I know that there were some posted here, not all that long ago.
As to your final query...the answer is not just no, but HELL NO! Having him in a debate wastes valuable time, which more serious candidates could talk.
Paul is pro-leaglizing of illicit substances, antiwar, was for the GZ Mosque, and he will never be anything other than a KOOK and a joke, to the vast majority of Americans.His rapid supporters are a rag tag bunch and many of them are no more than hooligans, whose behavior, on '08, was highly objectionable and to some extent, violent.