[4rcane]

in both your examples, i dont consider the girl or the daughter responsible for the rape. The fault, responsiblity and blame lie totally with the rapist because the girl/daughter did nothing wrong even if going down a risky dark street.

Ron Paul blame US for terrorist attack by supporting Israel, but US is not doing anything wrong by supporting Israel.

Israel is only defending their right to exist and there is nothing wrong with supporting this position. When terrorist attack US for US defending Israel right to exist, it is the terrorist that are wrong and not the US.

This is why I disagree with Ron Paul. Ron Paul may explain why terrorist do what they do, but its wrong to justify, defend or excuse terrorist’s action

[Gondring]

Ron Paul blame US for terrorist attack by supporting Israel, but US is not doing anything wrong by supporting Israel.

Don't you see the fallacy in your claim?

• If the woman goes into the alley, she's not doing anything wrong, but it can lead to consequences. Warning of those consequences doesn't mean you are claiming that she is "responsible" for those consequences.
  
• If the US supports Israel, it's not doing anything wrong, but it can lead to consequences. Warning of those consequences doesn't mean the US is "responsible" for those consequences.

Yet in the latter case, you twist things and paste a lie onto Ron Paul for noting the consequences, claiming that he's "blaming" when he gives warnings and reasons. It's a typical liberal smearing technique used against Ron Paul and other conservatives--please don't perpetuate it.

And then you imply that Ron Paul doesn't believe the terrorists are wrong for attacking the US? Come on.

Ron Paul may explain why terrorist do what they do, but its wrong to justify, defend or excuse terrorist’s action

If you have footage of him doing such a thing, share it, as it's not in the public domain, to my knowledge.