Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New shipborne navy jet fighter makes waves among analysts (China)
Global Times, China ^ | April 25 2011 | Xu Tianran

Posted on 04/24/2011 7:40:40 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki

New shipborne navy jet fighter makes waves among analysts

Unofficially dubbed the J-15, the new People's Liberation Army navy's "flying shark" features enlarged folding wings, twin nose wheels and an arresting hook for use on China's first aircraft carrier.

Photo: Courtesy of netizen Zhang Xinliang

By Xu Tianran

Photos of a domestic-made shipborne J-15 heavy fighter were released on Sunday afternoon on Internet defense forums, prompting many military observers to coo about China's aircraft carrier capacity.

"Heavy shipborne fighters will boost the aircraft carrier fleet's air defense capability and enhance the fleet's strike ability," said Lan Yun, editor of the Modern Ships, a Beijing-based magazine following the latest developments in warships and defense equipment.

"They can carry many air-to-air missiles or air-to-surface missiles and other kinds of airborne munitions," Lan told the Global Times. "And they have the benefit of long combat radius."

The fighters are to be stationed onboard the Chinese Varyag aircraft carrier, which is under renovation in Dalian, according to defense media. The giant ship has had radars and electronic warfare equipment installed, the Canada-based Kanwa Daily News reported.

on Sunday's photos of the fighter were taken outside the airfield of the No. 112 Factory of Shenyang Aircraft Industry Corporation, a company of the Aviation Industry Corporation of China (AVIC), and were uploaded onto the cjdby.net and fyjs.cn military forums after 1:30 pm on Sunday.

Videos and smaller photos showing the fighter flying over Shenyang had been circulating on the Internet since June. This time the fighter was seen with a standard naval paint scheme, according to photos released on Sunday.

The fighter has distinctive features that enable it to operate on an aircraft carrier, such as folding wings and strengthened landing gear, according to the Chinese Military Aviation (CMA).

Missile launch rails and wide-angle holographic Head Up Display (HUD) clearly indicated that the fighter is equipped with domestic sensors, avionics and weapon systems, the website reported, just like later models of the Shenyang J-11 fighter. The fighter dubbed J-15 is based on a Russian Su-33 in terms of structural configuration, it also said.

The Russian Ria Novosti news quoted a Russian military analyst saying that China's J-15 is inferior to the Russian aircraft.

Lan Yun refuted the claim. "The sensors, avionics and missiles of the Su-33 are already obsolete," Lan said, adding that the Chinese airborne electronics could offer more advanced technologies.

The first prototype J-15 was believed to have made its maiden flight on August 31, 2009, a month before the 60th anniversary of the founding of the People's Republic of China, according to the Russian Ria Novosti news.

Lin Zuoming, AVIC general manager, published a poem in the China Aviation News newspaper one day later, celebrating the "breakthrough of scientific research." on Sunday's photos came at about the same time as foreign media quoted a Chinese blogger claiming a Vertical/Short Take-Off and Landing (V/STOL) shipborne fighter for the Varyag is conducting flight tests in the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, the US-based Defense News. The foreign reports were dismissed by an AVIC spokesman as pure speculation on April 18.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Japan; News/Current Events; Russia
KEYWORDS: aerospace; china; j15; navair; su27
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

1 posted on 04/24/2011 7:40:42 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

I hereby dub this aircraft “The Chinese Widowmaker”.


2 posted on 04/24/2011 7:42:28 PM PDT by Lurker (The avalanche has begun. The pebbles no longer have a vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

3 posted on 04/24/2011 7:43:35 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

I dub this aircraft the “free trade” dragon.


4 posted on 04/24/2011 7:45:01 PM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network (Birther on Board)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lurker
I am shocked, shocked I tell you at the disrespect you show the CHICOM aircraft industry! They leave no stone unturned in coming up with advanced features for their wizard new aircraft. Take 1 from country column A, add three from country column B, Don't forget that on Thursday nights only, you also get a bonus pick from country column D! Wrap it all together with the avionics package gifted to them by Billy Clinton in exchange for untold sums.

Pretty darned impressive, I'd say. I notice that they are including the maneuvering brake/golf club compartment behind the cockpit (that's the thing covered with the Dollar Store All Purpose Handy-Dandy Camo tarp and shock cord outfit. Made in China)

These advanced aircraft also serve a demographic purpose. There are so many more single men than women in CHICOMLand that anything that can be done to cut the number of single men is a good thing. You are correct ... it is a widow maker. This astounding technological development gives so many more wonderful Chinese girls the chance to at least become widows, rather than remain old maids.

5 posted on 04/24/2011 7:54:36 PM PDT by Kenny Bunk (Qadafi and Obama share a common advantage. No organized opposition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lurker; sukhoi-30mki

Hey, does this baby remind you of a scaled down B-70 Valkyrie?


6 posted on 04/24/2011 7:56:20 PM PDT by Kenny Bunk (Qadafi and Obama share a common advantage. No organized opposition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kenny Bunk
Hey, does this baby remind you of a scaled down B-70 Valkyrie?

A bit, yes. It'll be most impressive when they slam into the Pacific Ocean at Mach 1.5.

7 posted on 04/24/2011 8:02:13 PM PDT by Lurker (The avalanche has begun. The pebbles no longer have a vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Must admit I had my doubts. I thought this was vaporware.


8 posted on 04/24/2011 8:02:51 PM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kenny Bunk
"They leave no stone unturned in coming up with advanced features"

As you apparently already know these will be little more than targets against any US force.

ALL we have to do is keep our AMRAAM production up.

9 posted on 04/24/2011 8:04:01 PM PDT by Mariner (USS Tarawa, VQ3, USS Benjamin Stoddert, NAVCAMS WestPac, 7th Fleet, Navcommsta Puget Sound)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

What is it looking at everything around you in the news and the world, that makes you scoff at Chinese manufacturing abilities?

And are you contributing to those abilities, through support of misnamed “free trade”?


10 posted on 04/24/2011 8:04:34 PM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network (Birther on Board)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

Do not underestimate the Chinese, friend. They are smart, actually smarter than the White Man on an average, MUCH harder working, and they pose a serious threat.


11 posted on 04/24/2011 8:07:51 PM PDT by Lazamataz (The Democrat Party is Communist. The Republican Party is Socialist. The Tea Party is Capitalist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

>> They are smart, actually smarter than the White Man on an average, MUCH harder working,

Nonsense.


12 posted on 04/24/2011 8:12:01 PM PDT by Gene Eric (*** Jesus ***)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

Will be a hoot to watch these copycats try to learn carrier landing. You oughta be able to see the fireball from Hawaii.

We learned it apparently better than anyone else by starting out on slow recip aircraft, not Mach 1.5 hugeass things. They can not copy experience and training. I don’t think its in their genes.


13 posted on 04/24/2011 8:12:12 PM PDT by dusttoyou ("Progressives" are wee-weeing all over themselves, Foc nobama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Special thanks to Bent Bill Clinton and GW Bush.


14 posted on 04/24/2011 8:12:34 PM PDT by Cheetahcat ( November 4 2008 ,A date which will live in Infamy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

“They are smart, actually smarter than the White Man on an average, MUCH harder working, and they pose a serious threat.”

That is why they have to copy everything. Now LOL LOL that is funny!


15 posted on 04/24/2011 8:16:08 PM PDT by Cheetahcat ( November 4 2008 ,A date which will live in Infamy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
To some degree you are right. Don't jack with them where they can walk or drive to you, getting that hoard overseas is a whole nuther story.

At some point they will self-distruct just like the other china dynasties.

16 posted on 04/24/2011 8:17:48 PM PDT by dusttoyou ("Progressives" are wee-weeing all over themselves, Foc nobama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Any specs? Looks way bigger than a Tomcat and that was pushing carrier architecture at the time.


17 posted on 04/24/2011 8:24:20 PM PDT by buccaneer81 (ECOMCON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dusttoyou
I sure hope not!

China Dynasty

18 posted on 04/24/2011 8:27:12 PM PDT by buccaneer81 (ECOMCON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Cheetahcat

Darn, I forget. Have they copied our nukes too? They still go boom, don’t they?


19 posted on 04/24/2011 8:27:16 PM PDT by Loud Mime (Prayers for missing Marizela Perez. Prayers for her safe return.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

I canll it F15 “Deficit Hawk”


20 posted on 04/24/2011 8:29:20 PM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson