Posted on 04/24/2011 8:32:40 AM PDT by Kaslin
Well from what we can see he sent his people Moses.
Q: How many Christians would be willing to be personally damned to hell forever if by so doing all other people in the world would get to go to heaven?
I can name one Jesus! Jesus was the person who was willing to be damned to hell. It was an awesome work, one that I unashamedly say I could not do. We dont do good works to get into heaven or to avoid hell; this would be futile. Jesus did for us what we could not do.
It also had to do with willingly being eternally damned for the sake of others (which also isn't the case with Christ, as the Bible teaches that he was resurrected and will return as King of Kings.)
Doesn't the Bible teach that some people will be better off in heaven than others? And don't you think that this influences the behavior of Christians?
People are influenced by their believed self-interest. This includes Christians. That's not shocking. It's human.
You’re right on the mark. Even without an afterlife, though, a person may do good deeds via the self-interested motivation of feeling good about helping others.
That's what is being claimed earlier in the thread, for those who are in heaven.
Heh...I know that all too well (not from my grandfather, but does a great-uncle count? ;-).
You cant bang on the doors of the casino and demand your grandfathers money back because it should have come to you.
So when Jesus helped a crippled beggar, He could have said, "nope--your ancestor could have saved money for your care, but he didn't, so don't look at me!"?
I thought it was Godly to be charitable, yet here you're implying that God--who has unlimited resources and ability to give--is right to allow descendants of Adam to wallow wounded in the dirt?
Same thing with forgiveness. We are to give others many, many chances for redemption. I note there is no chance to redeem our Eden on earth.
The downtrodden have no right to your money, nor can they demand you give to them, yet Jesus taught it was right to give to them nonetheless. Why would we--made in the image of Him, told to emulate Him--expect less of Him?
Everybody wants to feel important, to be important. Why is this? It's part of our human nature. Was it put there by God or by evolution? Some people believe the first, others believe the latter.
Whichever it was, when we make a positive difference in the world, we are important. Our contribution matters.
“I note there is no chance to redeem our Eden on earth. “
Again, I totally disagree.
Jesus is our chance to redeem our Eden on earth. If anyone (poor or rich, great or insignificant, any race, any intelligence) put their trust in Him - they will be saved, and go to heaven; and at the end of the world God is making a new heaves and a new earth; Eden restored.
The gospel is offered to all.
Those who are in heaven already proved to God they love Him and want to be with Him. Kind of why they are there. The test is over. They will never leave God’s presence again. You can take that to the bank because God tells us so in the bible, multiple places.
Are you really honestly asking this or are you just asking to be argumentative?
Let me rephrase. I believe that Christ descended into Hades (Acts 2:31.) I do believe Hades/Hell are one in the same, though Im not willing to die on that hill.
I dont think I misunderstood you. I think youre saying people, including Christians, can mostly act in their own self-interest. I am saying that Christ is the one who broke that mold. He didnt endure His suffering to gain entrance into Heaven, to stay out of Hell, or to get a better place in Heaven.
I did not, and wont, argue that Christians arent ever motivated by their own interests of course we are! I am contrasting Christ with the rest of humanity.
In response to Doesn’t the Bible teach that some people will be better off in heaven than others? And don’t you think that this influences the behavior of Christians? The funny thing here is I never said anything to the contrary. I said we dont do good works to get into heaven or to get out of hell.
I’ll pray for your woundedness.
You work way to hard at misunderstanding.
So the omnipotent father rescues his child, or the gives to the beggar, only after a test is passed?
Are you really honestly asking this or are you just asking to be argumentative?
I'm not just being argumentative. Do you not see the problem with the claims being made in the story? Do you not see that the idea of "testing" someone in need before helping him contradicts other teachings?
God is not going to force anyone to be around Him for eternity if they spend their entire life on this earth deliberately rejecting Him.
Now that would be torture to these people, to be stuck around the people that love God and want to be around Him and enjoy being with Him, when that’s never been what these people wanted in the first place.
I meant “the test is over” not in the sense that it saves them, it is merely a recognition of the life they lived that showed they loved God, knew they needed Him and His gift of salvation, and that they trusted God and knew that He was working things for their good, whether personally their situation was good or bad at the moment.
If you’re just here playing devils advocate, I have no desire to debate this with you. If you’ve already made up your mind that God isn’t for you, you’re not interested in hearing anything but are just picking apart people’s answers to you. Either way I’m done with you. Take care.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.