Certificate of Live Birth Time Stamp Revealed

Snopes.com ^ | June, 2008 | Snopes

[TwelveOfTwenty]

56% is much higher than 50%. You definitely are a liar. A baldfaced liar to boot. LOL

56% was the number who said the Wright connection made them less likely to vote for Obama. According to one of the other links, "A majority of American voters say the furor over the relationship between Senator Barack Obama and his former pastor has not affected their opinion of Mr. Obama". Granted, you can't have 56% affected while a majority weren't, but this does show that a much higher percentage than the 50% you keep dumping knew of his ties.

Not to mention you're ignoring that the 56% doesn't come from asking the question "have you heard of Rev. Wright." Pathetic.

Here, grab some enlightenment. They would have had to have heard of him to form an opinion.

Now the most credible poll posted is a bogus poll? You’re reaching for straws with your pathetic attempts to win a point. Loser!

What makes this one poll (NBC/WSJ, BTW) more credible than all of the others? Do you honestly think that with all of the ink the Wright scandal got that 50% never heard of him?

[little jeremiah]

Are you being paid double time on Easter Sunday or something? I guess even time and a half would motivate you to continue posting lie after nonsense after drooling nonsense.

Or maybe you get paid by the post.

Which ever way it is, you’ll have to play with yourself now.

[TwelveOfTwenty]

Hey Little JeraLiah, repeat.

(Your previous) Second, you are saying “drop the eligilibity issue now”.

(My previous) Where? Show me the post, and post the text where I said this.

Go back to DU/Cass Sunstein’s office/KOS or where ever you belong.

Repeat, show me the post, and post the text where I said this. If you can't find it, then admit you were wrong.

[Sto Zvirat]

Yeah, he loves to pull up old posts on people to try to embarrass them, but hates it when people do it to him. Once a nutter, always a nutter. They just move from one conspiracy to another, never actually accepting reality.

[aruanan]

What is even more interesting is that the long form BC from the month and year and hospital of Obama's alleged birth doesn't even include a notation for race or religion.

and how do you know this?

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2709655/posts

this is a copy of a long form birth certificate for a child born within 1 day of obama at the hospital (one of two) he claims to be born in

(a child who would later be one of his kindergarten classmates)

Note blocks 9 and 14 do specify race- of the parents

Yes, but there is nothing to indicate race of the child, which was one of the speculations as to why Obama would want to cover up his long form BC since he may have been listed as "white." We can see through this long form BC from within a day of his birth at one of the hospitals he was alleged to have been born that this isn't the case, as I stated earlier and to which you puzzlingly replied, "and how do you know this" after which you provided the link to the very document to which I alluded.

[TigersEye]

Aim small miss small. ;^)

[little jeremiah]

It’s obvious to anyone who is not an administration hireling troll, that I was paraphrasing you.

Carry on, earn your tainted wages.

Oh, btw - ever heard of the law of karma? It exists independently of one’s belief or lack of belief.

[MHGinTN]

Only asshats speak to a Lady that way. You are not worthy of further replies.

[little jeremiah]

Thank you - I may be a lady, but I am an attack lady.

:-)

[TwelveOfTwenty]

Forget this toad, lj. He’s outed himself as a lying liberal 0bot troll.

You're not getting out of this that easily. Here's more.

From Foxnews, 72 percent of Americans are familiar with the comments made by Wright

Also from Foxnews: FOX News Poll: Wright Ties Hurt Obama Campaign Add up the percentages to see how many knew about Wright, according to this poll.

From USATODAY, 8 of 10 Americans have been following the Wright controversy.

There's plenty more where this came from.

[TwelveOfTwenty]

It’s obvious to anyone who is not an administration hireling troll, that I was paraphrasing you.

Really. A paraphrase is "a restatement of a text or passage giving the meaning in another form". So tell me, how do you get “drop the eligilibity issue now” from my post TO YOU to "Pursue the birther issue if it's important to you"?

If you can't, then admit you were wrong.

Oh, btw - ever heard of the law of karma? It exists independently of one’s belief or lack of belief.

You must be speaking from experience. You are the one who started with calling me a liar in post 196. Now, you are warning me about karma? Thanks for your concern.

[TwelveOfTwenty]

Only asshats speak to a Lady that way.

Spare me your fake chivalry. Ladies don't make false statements about others while calling them liars, as lj did. Besides, if she's big enough to dish it out, she's big enough to take it.

You are not worthy of further replies.

Then don't reply to my posts, problem solved.

[TigersEye]

A Fox News poll? LMAO

[BunnySlippers]

Book

[TommyDale]

Agree. That was the reason I posted this to begin with. It needs to be refreshed in everyone’s mind.

[GatorGirl]

I haven’t read all of the comments, but wouldn’t 2007 be the date of the copy? I know when we get a certified copy of a document the certification date is stamped, not the creation date.

Also “African” is probably more true than “Negro” as Obama Sr. was indeed African (from Africa).

I’d like to see not only the real birth certificate (not this forgery) but passport records, school records, grades, prior writings, everything. This guy is an utter fraud. But those aspects of this “document” don’t bother me.

[TommyDale]

No, “African” is NOT one of the possible choices in Hawaii as a “Race”. And in 1961 it would have been “Negro” not even “Black” had be adopted. I agree with all the other info. The point is that there are a lot of inconsistencies and too many people are just accepting this document as THE document. I want to see who the real father was.

[TigersEye]

Yeah, he loves to pull up old posts on people to try to embarrass them,...

Pretty kooky coming from someone who brought up a five month old thread, on another subject, on this thread.

post #180

To: TigersEye

Will you finally admit you were wrong about the “missile” launch off Los Angeles last November?

180 posted on Saturday, April 23, 2011 10:40:48 PMSto Zvirat

[SunkenCiv]

Thanks TommyDale.

[Sto Zvirat]

Wanted you to taste your own medicine.

So..any data on your “missile” or are you going to weenie out on your last kooky quest? Will you weenie out on this one when you have a new conspiracy?

LOL