I’ve heard of moral absolutes. Assuming this was a guy, then 0nce the two black teenagers “won” the battle and made their point by bashing him a couple of times and preventing him from using or wanting to use the lady’s room, then they should have ended their attack immediately. They won.
Speaking of moral absolutes, I would say it was not moral to win and then spend the next several minutes trying to beat that person to death. The minute they started to severely beat an unarmed person lying on the floor who was not fighting back - they crossed the line of moral absolutes.
Any Freeper who condones the beating of ANYBODY who is unarmed, not a threat, lying prone and not fighting back, under any conditions, is condoning evil.
There are your moral absolutes.
Are you deliberately ignoring the point of my post?
Outrage was the motivation, not so much race, and that is why they are being demonized by the media. Had their motive been Black on White racism, the media would have looked the other way.