Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: okie01; Gaffer; rawhide
If you would bother to read the last sentence in the story of this thread, you might have an epiphany...........

We are working with the franchisee and the local authorities to investigate this matter.

Notice that there is no mention of a "Corporate Store"..........

146 posted on 04/22/2011 2:16:04 PM PDT by Hot Tabasco (It's a beautiful day and I'm glad I can see it in color.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies ]


To: Hot Tabasco
And, I invite you to view post 90 in case you had not viewed it before. At this point, truth is whatever lawyers can get away with and make a jury believe.

Sheesh....you really expect some MSM robot to get things right? Wanna buy a bridge? BTW, I really think the big letters in your post will change my mind now and make me relent...

The point is that McD's will distance themselves from this whether it is corporate or franchised. Hell, maybe McD's got smart after the Panama City [banned description]-freakout and decided to call all stores franchises now.

In the end, they will produce something that legally tries to absolve them from culpability.

152 posted on 04/22/2011 2:26:37 PM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies ]

To: Hot Tabasco; Gaffer; rawhide
Sorry, Hot, you made a declarative statement -- and I quote:

If you host the McDonalds sign, you are a franchisee..........

And that simply isn't true -- as the three of us pointed out.

So, don't complain that we corrected your misstatement. Or try to spin that you were actually right. You weren't.

It' unbecoming...

157 posted on 04/22/2011 2:46:52 PM PDT by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance On Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson