If you believe Trump is a conservative, you are certainly entitled to it. But Trump is anything but. He is also a big flip flopper
Of course he is.
Michelle Malkin is another Conservative who completely turned her back on the questions of the Obama undocumented past. Yet, she now finds it important to expose the past of Donald Trump? Why the inconsistency?
I like reading Michelle Malkin's stuff, normally. What I don't like is her attitude, along with other Conservative types, of talking down to the many who have unanswered questions about this President's history, telling them (in essence) to stop with the questions and focus on issues.
Well Michelle, the people you (and seemingly all others affiliated with Fox News) speak to are intelligent and brave enough to pursue the truth, wanting answers, whatever they may be. I resent being told what I should consider important and what I should believe.
So many of the Conservative and the Conservative want to be analysts (O'Reilly, Beck, Coulter, Levin, etc) have taken this stance, without ever explaining their logic. They tell us there's nothing there and to forget about the questions, it's a losing approach to defeating Obama. To all those, answer me why an individual with very few Conservative credentials, can become so popular in such a short time, using the questions of the Obama undocumented past?