[Rational Thought]

If you believe Trump is a conservative, you are certainly entitled to it. But Trump is anything but. He is also a big flip flopper.

Of course he is.

Michelle Malkin is another Conservative who completely turned her back on the questions of the Obama undocumented past. Yet, she now finds it important to expose the past of Donald Trump? Why the inconsistency?

I like reading Michelle Malkin's stuff, normally. What I don't like is her attitude, along with other Conservative types, of talking down to the many who have unanswered questions about this President's history, telling them (in essence) to stop with the questions and focus on issues.

Well Michelle, the people you (and seemingly all others affiliated with Fox News) speak to are intelligent and brave enough to pursue the truth, wanting answers, whatever they may be. I resent being told what I should consider important and what I should believe.

So many of the Conservative and the Conservative want to be analysts (O'Reilly, Beck, Coulter, Levin, etc) have taken this stance, without ever explaining their logic. They tell us there's nothing there and to forget about the questions, it's a losing approach to defeating Obama. To all those, answer me why an individual with very few Conservative credentials, can become so popular in such a short time, using the questions of the Obama undocumented past?

[Agamemnon]

I admire Michelle Malkin and her clarity of thought on most things.

That said, Donald Trump did not invent gambling, nor was he the one who got NJ to pass legislation that allowed parimutuel betting and casinos in Atlantic City, NJ in 1971 (Michelle was 1 year old at the time).

Donald Trump is in the interview process at the moment. Says alot of the right things, and speaks his mind aggressively and confidently. I haven't "hired" him yet, but I like what I am hearing.

We have a number of great, conservative women cheerleading for a conservative America -- Sarah Palin, Michelle Bachmann -- and I value their contributions to changing the game in our favor in the 2012 election cycle. I like what I hear from them too, but I haven't "hired" either of thm either.

Huckabee - and that jowly Nixonian 5-o'clock shadow + Mr. SmoothTalk.... Ball-less Palwenty aka Mr. Mock Turtle who couldn't stop Al Franken of all people from stealing a Senate seat.... Mr. door-to-door FullerBrushman-like salesman Romney.... Is THAT the best we've got when it comes to the "mensch"-factor?

We are vetting a quarterback.

Alot of us are in the mood for a pit-bull right about now.

Those guys -- maybe one can be in charge of the Gator-aide, another can be in charge of picking up the jock straps on the floor, and another can sweep up after the lockeroom is emptied out -- but none of them are quaterback material.

Our fellow FReeper, and now Congressman Allen West said if Trump asked him to be his running mate, he'd strongly consider it.

Trump + West? That looks like a team that could carry the ball a great distance.

I would "hire" West, and I might be pursuaded eventually to hire the other guy too. But I can name 3 others who needn't even try to pretend they could quarterback anything. Not saying they or the girls might not have a job to do in the 2012 election cycle, but maybe not as big as anyone currently might be envisioning for themselves.

And when we do select our quarterback, I'll expect Michelle Malkin to be a team player and get behind our "guy" too.

FReegards!