Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ctdonath2

Not quite. his mother was too young for her to confere citzenship on him, and she may have alienated herself and Brack by leaving the country and letting her new husband adopt him. Of course, he may have repatriated himself and this could have been done by the inattention of the authorities. The law with regard to odd cases is hardly explicit. The very court decision Wong van Ark(?) that set the precedent for anchor babies. actually has to be evealuated in terms of the law in place at the time. The Chinese Exclusion Act set the legal staage at that time. Ironically, the fact of his having been born in Germany—and brought to the US at age of three. Was probably all that kept John Peter Altgeld from being the Democratric nominee for President in 1896.


147 posted on 04/20/2011 2:03:44 PM PDT by RobbyS (Pray with the suffering souls.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]


To: RobbyS

Hmmm...I’m not up to speed on that one.


158 posted on 04/20/2011 2:13:46 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach ( Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies ]

To: RobbyS
Not quite. his mother was too young for her to confere citzenship on him.

I've never seen this particular point before. Since my wife did obstetrics for years, and I heard stories, this begs the question: What is, in your opinion then, the legal status of a child born to two 16 year old parents? It happens more often than you think.

194 posted on 04/20/2011 4:22:52 PM PDT by Melas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson