Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

IAEA: Fukushima Nuclear Accident Update [20-April-2011
IAEA ^ | 20-April-2011 | Staff report

Posted on 04/20/2011 12:03:27 PM PDT by topher

IAEA Briefing on Fukushima Nuclear Accident (20 April 2011, 16:00 UTC) Presentation:

On Wednesday, 20 April 2011, the IAEA provided the following information on the current status of nuclear safety in Japan:

1. Current Situation

Overall, the situation at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant remains very serious, but there are early signs of recovery in some functions, such as electrical power and instrumentation.

Changes to Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant Status

The IAEA receives information from a variety of official Japanese sources through the Japanese national competent authority, the Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency (NISA). Additional detail is provided in the IEC status summary with information received by 07:00 UTC on 20 April 2011.

Management of On-Site Contaminated Water

TEPCO has provided a plan to NISA for the transfer of highly contaminated water from the basement of the turbine building of Unit 2 to the main building of the radioactive waste treatment facilities, to reduce the risk of this stagnant waste water being discharged to the environment. Measures to ensure that the radioactive waste treatment facility is watertight were completed on 18 April and the transfer of water from Unit 2 was commenced on 19 April.

Plant Status

Work to strengthen the electrical power system between Units 1 - 2 and Units 3 - 4 was completed on 19 April. White "smoke" continues to be emitted from Units 2, 3 and 4.

In Unit 1 fresh water is being continuously injected into the reactor pressure vessel through the feedwater line at an indicated flow rate of 6 m3/h using a temporary electric pump with off-site power. In Units 2 and 3 fresh water is being continuously injected into the reactor pressure vessel through the fire extinguisher line at an indicated rate of 7 m3/h using a temporary electric pump with off-site power. In Unit 4 fresh water continues to be sprayed onto the spent fuel pool using a concrete pump truck.

Nitrogen gas is being injected into the containment vessel in Unit 1 to reduce the possibility of hydrogen combustion within the containment vessel. The pressure in the containment vessel has stabilized. The pressure in the reactor pressure vessel is increasing.

The reactor pressure vessel temperatures in Unit 1 remain above cold shutdown conditions. The indicated temperature at the feedwater nozzle of the reactor pressure vessel is 164 °C and that at the bottom of reactor pressure vessel is 114 °C.

The reactor pressure vessel temperatures in Unit 2 remain above cold shutdown conditions. The indicated temperature at the feed water nozzle of the reactor pressure vessel is 133 °C. The reactor pressure vessel and the dry well remain at atmospheric pressure.

The temperature at the bottom of the reactor pressure vessel in Unit 3 remains above cold shutdown conditions. The indicated temperature at the feed water nozzle of the reactor pressure vessel is 99 °C and that at the bottom of reactor pressure vessel is 110 °C. The reactor pressure vessel and the dry well remain at atmospheric pressure.

There has been no change in the status in Units 5 and 6 or in the common spent fuel storage facility.

2. Radiation Monitoring

On 19 April, deposition of I-131 was detected in 13 prefectures, ranging from 1.8 to 368 Bq/m2. Deposition of Cs-137 was detected in seven prefectures, the values reported ranging from 2.4 to 160 Bq/m2.

Gamma dose rates are measured daily in all 47 prefectures. For Fukushima on 20 April a gamma dose rate of 1.9 µSv/h was reported, and for Ibaraki prefecture a gamma dose rate of 0.13 µSv/h was reported. In all other prefectures, reported gamma dose rates were below 0.1 µSv/h.

In cooperation with local universities, the Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) has set up an additional monitoring programme. For 19 April, measurements of the gamma dose rates were reported for 53 cities in 40 prefectures. In Fukushima City a value of 0.42 µSv/h was reported. For all other cities reported gamma dose rates were below 0.13 µSv/h.

In drinking water, I-131 or Cs-137 is detectable, but at levels below 1 Bq/L and in only a few prefectures. As of 17 April, one restriction on drinking water for infants relating to I-131 (100 Bq/L) is in place in a small scale water supply in a village of the Fukushima prefecture.

Food monitoring data reported by the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare on 19 April covered a total of 36 samples. These were taken on 4, 18 and 19 April from eight prefectures (Chiba, Fukushima, Gunma, Ibaraki, Kanagawa, Nagano, Niigata and Saitama). Analytical results for 35 of the samples of various vegetables, shiitake mushrooms, fruit (strawberries), edible shoots (Japanese Angelica tree), seafood, yoghurt and unprocessed raw milk indicated that I-131, Cs-134 and Cs-137 were either not detected or were below the regulation values set by the Japanese authorities. One sample of seafood (sand lance) taken on 18 April from the coastal region of Fukushima had levels above the regulation values set by the Japanese authorities for I-131 and also for radioactive caesium.

3. Marine Monitoring

TEPCO Monitoring Programme

TEPCO is conducting a programme for seawater monitoring (by surface sampling) at a number of near-shore and off-shore monitoring locations. Following a directive from NISA, on 16 April TEPCO announced that it will increase the number of sea sampling points from ten to 16. A further four points are to be added at 3 km from the coast and two points are to be added at 8 km from the coast. The new sampling sites are indicated on Map 1: TEPCO Seawater Sampling Locations, on which new points are indicated with green bullets.

On some days, two samples were collected at the same sampling point, a few hours apart, and analysed separately.

Until 3 April a generally decreasing trend in radioactivity was observed at the sampling points TEPCO 1 to TEPCO 4. After the discharge of contaminated water from the plant on 4 April, a temporary increase in radioactivity in seawater was reported. Since 5 April a general downward trend in the concentration of radionuclides in seawater for all TEPCO sampling points has been observed.

On 20 April no new data for TEPCO 1 - 4 sampling points were reported. For TEPCO 5 - 10, data for TEPCO 8 only were reported on 20 April (for sampling on 17 April). Both I-131 and Cs-137 were below 0.1 kBq/L.

MEXT Off-shore Monitoring Programme

On 20 April no new data were reported for the MEXT off-shore sampling locations shown on Map 2: MEXT Seawater sampling Locations.

4. IAEA Activities

Sri Lanka has also provided monitoring data, in addition to the countries that have been mentioned in previous briefs.

On 18 April the IAEA monitoring team finished its radiological monitoring campaign and the team is to return to Vienna on 20 April.


TOPICS: Japan; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bwr; fukushima; japan; nuclear
Sounds like progress is being made, but it also sounds like it will be a year or two before things at these reactors are in good shape
1 posted on 04/20/2011 12:03:31 PM PDT by topher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: topher

to Japan’s advantage, the reactors sit on the ocean and ocean breezes siphon off a lot of the “White “smoke” “

but why call radioactive steam ‘smoke’?


2 posted on 04/20/2011 12:20:25 PM PDT by blueplum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: topher
The IAEA receives information from a variety of official Japanese sources through the Japanese national competent authority, the Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency (NISA). Additional detail is provided in the IEC status summary with information received by 07:00 UTC on 20 April 2011.

Second hand information. The IAEA never 'digs', they just spout what they are told.
3 posted on 04/20/2011 12:20:25 PM PDT by allmost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: allmost

Except for directly speaking with the Shift Supervisor in Japanese, what do you propose? The indications are what the instruments say they are. What reason would there be to falsify such information? Any significant deviation these announcements have from actual conditions will be readily recognized.


4 posted on 04/20/2011 12:31:24 PM PDT by sefarkas (Why vote Democrat Lite?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sefarkas
I could clog this thread with IAEA incompetence in response to your response. ;)

The Japanese government, and it's (now)subsidiary power company are the source here. Do you disagree?
5 posted on 04/20/2011 12:35:38 PM PDT by allmost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: topher
The reactor pressure vessel temperatures in Unit 1 remain above cold shutdown conditions. The indicated temperature at the feedwater nozzle of the reactor pressure vessel is 164 °C and that at the bottom of reactor pressure vessel is 114 °C.

Good to see the effective use of nitrogen gas to prevent another hydrogen explosion. Temperatures about 100°C are not good; hope the Japanese power company gets it under control soon.

6 posted on 04/20/2011 12:52:16 PM PDT by olezip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: allmost

Clearly the power company is the source of the information. It is their power plant and their instrumentation that the announcements are based on. I do not understand your basis for believing that the technical information provided is inaccurate. Maybe you are challenging the prognosis for achieving cold shutdown and stopping small leaks, a more permanent solution to connecting to off-site power, etc. Those may be optimistic. The state of each NSSS is a simple matter of reporting pressure, temperature, volume, and dose-rates measured at fixed points. Those thermodynamic and radiographic properties are what I am suggesting cannot be disguised for very long.


7 posted on 04/20/2011 12:55:02 PM PDT by sefarkas (Why vote Democrat Lite?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: blueplum

I think “smoke” is in quotes because they don’t know its origin or composition.

Maybe it’s steam. Maybe it’s the product of combustion or other pyrolytic decomposition.

It would probably be good to find out.


8 posted on 04/20/2011 12:57:42 PM PDT by SargeK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sefarkas
I don't trust the IAEA.

This is an active 'crisis' in Japan so I do read about it somewhat.
9 posted on 04/20/2011 1:01:00 PM PDT by allmost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: topher
The reactors are in good shape right now. #3's feed water nozzle temperature has increased to 100 ºC, a sign, IMHO, that liquid water is reaching that level, that is, that boiling has reduced as the temperature of the core decreases. #3 is approaching cold shutdown conditions and soon the amount of water injected might be reduced. which in return would reduce the "smoke" emissions and water leaks.

Reactor #2 is also quite cold. The problem here is the leaks of contaminated water. Anyways the building seems to hold, as the robot showed early this week.

Reactor #1's temperatures have plummeted since the April 7th earthquake, after which they reached 270 ºC at the water feed nozzle (now it is 164ºC). In addition here contention is still holding, which probably contributes to the increase in pressure.

In addition, radiative material levels measured around the plant have also plummeted since the leak from #2 unit to the sea was tackled. Those levels are below 10 times the limit (ten times a tiny amount yields a tiny amount).

The main problem in the plant remains personnel. No repair work can be performed in the turbine buildings since the radiactive levels are so high that any worker would be exposed in a matter of hours to the yearly dose. If TEPCO tries to perform these tasks right now, they would run out of experienced workers very soon. So they have to move first radiactive water and any radiactive debris out of the buildings, before connecting probably 6.6 kV power feeding cables to the reactor's and activate valves and pumps.
10 posted on 04/21/2011 12:15:15 AM PDT by J Aguilar (Fiat Justitia et ruat coelum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: topher; All; Munz; LucyT; mojitojoe; Smokin' Joe; Alamo-Girl; ExTexasRedhead
TEPCO finally released data on radioactive plutonium on March 28, and it stated that plutonium -238, -239, and -240 were found in the ground, but insisted that it posed no human risk Click
11 posted on 04/26/2011 7:46:11 AM PDT by Larousse2 (The price of Freedom is Eternal Vigilance. ~ Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson