Skip to comments.
Michigan: Police Search Cell Phones During Traffic Stops
THE NEWSPAPER ^
| April 20, 2011
| swampsniper
Posted on 04/20/2011 6:49:30 AM PDT by SWAMPSNIPER
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
To: yldstrk
Not a matter of trust.
As they say, "If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."
If you don't object to a search, that doesn't make a search legal. It's 100% up to the cop to know AND FOLLOW the law, not the citizen to inform them. Any sufficiently "dedicated" cop is going to claim that you consented anyway.
Certainly, I'd agree that voicing your rights ("I do not consent to that search.") is logical and advisable, but the lack of such a declaration carries no weight in court.
21
posted on
04/20/2011 8:29:35 AM PDT
by
SJSAMPLE
To: yldstrk
Also, one of my favorite sites:
http://www.fourthamendment.com/blog/
A very good source of information for the citizen dedicated to knowing and enforcing their Constitutional rights.
22
posted on
04/20/2011 8:32:05 AM PDT
by
SJSAMPLE
To: 556x45
It’s awkward to have dueling impressions. I support them when they defend against the legitimate criminal element, but I no longer trust them, as they increasingly represent stealth tax collectors, militarized governmental gangmembers and capricious thugs. I expect that most are still good, sensible people, but I’m not willing to roll the dice.
23
posted on
04/20/2011 8:33:31 AM PDT
by
catbertz
To: SWAMPSNIPER
If they start this nonsense in Ohio,I’ll make sure that I always have a large cup of Cola in the cupholder.If they ask for my phone,it’s going in the cup.
24
posted on
04/20/2011 9:09:06 AM PDT
by
Farmer Dean
(stop worrying about what they want to do to you,start thinking about what you want to do to them)
To: G Larry
And your point?
25
posted on
04/20/2011 9:15:13 AM PDT
by
starlifter
(Pullum sapit)
To: SWAMPSNIPER
how about lawyer’s phones? client data and emails and txt msgs there.
how about judges?
how about reporter sources?
how about someone who is just anti-union?
police aready record license plates of groups they don’t like.
27
posted on
04/20/2011 9:19:43 AM PDT
by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
To: yldstrk
I heard that Apple has a file on th iPhone that keeps a record of everwhere(lat.&long.) you've been. And you can't turn the function off.
28
posted on
04/20/2011 9:48:20 AM PDT
by
tbpiper
To: yldstrk
I heard that Apple has a file on th iPhone that keeps a record of everwhere(lat.&long.) you've been. And you can't turn the function off.
29
posted on
04/20/2011 9:48:30 AM PDT
by
tbpiper
To: catbertz
LOL, honest answer, very good! :) Thx! BTW I suspect them all and would never assume they’re OK.
30
posted on
04/20/2011 9:49:24 AM PDT
by
556x45
To: yldstrk
“Any search by consent is valid. So, you gotta say: I do not consent to that search.”
That is false. Not knowing the cops are performing a search is not consent. Second, you do not need to tell them you are asserting your rights for those rights to be protected.
31
posted on
04/20/2011 10:32:33 AM PDT
by
CodeToad
(Islam needs to be banned in the US and treated as a criminal enterprise.)
To: CodeToad
Failure to object to a search can imply consent. Unless you're a top notch criminal defense attorney the rule is to always object to any kind of search that you do not wish to consent to.
32
posted on
04/20/2011 10:38:56 AM PDT
by
free me
(Sarah Palin 2012? You Betcha!)
To: starlifter
My “point” is that I don’t believe the ACLU when they claim these devices are being used in traffic stops.
There are no citizen complaints to back it up.
I believe the ACLU doesn’t like the cops using these in on-going crimnal investigations and they’ve created this strawman to fight it.
This could be a great tool used on VICTIM’S phones, to learn recent contacts and whereabouts.
33
posted on
04/20/2011 11:28:32 AM PDT
by
G Larry
To: Springman; sergeantdave; cyclotic; netmilsmom; RatsDawg; PGalt; FreedomHammer; queenkathy; ...
MIping
If you wish to be added to or removed from the Michigan ping list, please post or FReepmail me.
34
posted on
04/20/2011 2:29:39 PM PDT
by
magslinger
(What Would Stephen Decatur Do?)
To: G Larry
To: G Larry
I am a citizen and consider this a complaint. Do you believe you are the property of the government?
To: nickcarraway
Have some coffee and pay attention!
The only folks claiming the cops are doing this are the ACLU!
For some reason, I don’t believe them.
Perhaps it is because no individual citizen has complained that cops have used this device on their cell phone?
Get it?
37
posted on
04/20/2011 4:45:20 PM PDT
by
G Larry
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Yes....that’s an Apple problem, not a cop violating your rights.
38
posted on
04/20/2011 4:47:41 PM PDT
by
G Larry
To: CodeToad
I totally agree on “not knowing they are performing a search” but not on the rest.
39
posted on
04/20/2011 7:46:43 PM PDT
by
yldstrk
(My heroes have always been cowboys)
To: SJSAMPLE
I suppose that would depend on the Court and the roll of the dice and if someone can afford representation.
40
posted on
04/20/2011 7:49:55 PM PDT
by
yldstrk
(My heroes have always been cowboys)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson