You have to look beyond whoever ‘wins’ or ‘loses’ in this particular case, and focus on the ‘precedent’ being set by the SCOTUS in deferring to the ‘experts’ of the EPA, saying that the courts do not have the necessary expertise in whatever the ‘science’ in question is being debated..................
I know that but that isn’t what this case is about.
Who do you think should win this one?
Not relevant. The choice was letting 'scientists' in liberal states decide that generating power in other states harms mother earth or having the feds step in. In this case the feds are the lesser of two evils.