Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Uhhh, a day late and trillions of dollars short.

Never have so many QuasiGubamintal Black Ops agencies worked so hard to destroy a nation and its underpinnings.

Hindsight is 20/20 they say.. Oversight is priceless..

Who put us in the mess, Ben? Fess up

1 posted on 04/19/2011 9:25:25 AM PDT by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: NormsRevenge

Unless of course you are an illegal or a minority and then there will be a whole new set of rules for you.


2 posted on 04/19/2011 9:27:56 AM PDT by applpie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

The abuses came from Democrats demanding “minorities” get home loans, so banks were required to make sub-prime loans. Now Democrats want to claim they were innocent and will clean up the problem.


3 posted on 04/19/2011 9:27:58 AM PDT by CodeToad (Islam needs to be banned in the US and treated as a criminal enterprise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge
Lenders would be required to make sure prospective borrowers have the ability to repay their mortgages before giving them a loan, under a proposal released by the Federal Reserve on Tuesday.

Gee, if I was running a bank, I would not need the feds to tell me this. MORONS!

4 posted on 04/19/2011 9:28:13 AM PDT by Lysandru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge
People can always save.

Will 20% Down Require Waiting 14 Years to Buy a Home?

5 posted on 04/19/2011 9:28:58 AM PDT by Palter (If voting made any difference they wouldn't let us do it. ~ Mark Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge
"lenders could be sued by the borrower if they do not take the proper steps to check a borrowers ability to repay the loan."

Huh? That's insane.

6 posted on 04/19/2011 9:29:36 AM PDT by avacado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

So why doesn’t the Fed follow their own rules? HUD is offering houses for 100 bucks down.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2705785/posts


8 posted on 04/19/2011 9:32:45 AM PDT by dawn53
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

“Lenders would be required to make sure prospective borrowers have the ability to repay their mortgages before giving them a loan”

What a novel idea.

Just where would we be without the genius of government?

sarc

meanwhile the turd world scammers among us gonna figure out how to lie to the lender, get the loan, then sue the lender for making the loan....


9 posted on 04/19/2011 9:33:05 AM PDT by silverleaf (All that is necessary for evil to succeed, is that good men do nothing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge
"Lenders would be required to make sure prospective borrowers have the ability to repay their mortgages before giving them a loan"

Who the hell came up with that plan?
What about us broke folks? (Number growing daily) Where will we live?
What did Barney Fag say about this?

10 posted on 04/19/2011 9:34:13 AM PDT by DeaconRed (Tobacco: The only industry that kills it's customers. . . . . . . Legally. . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

This will last until some community organizers whine to Congress that the banks won’t loan to “their people”.

Congress will require the banks to make bad loans to the special people.

The banks will complain to Congress that they can’t stay in business maing bad loans.

Congress will set up a mortgage guarantee program that will buy the mortgages from the banks so the banks aren’t stuck with bad loans.

The banks, relieved of the consequences of making bad loans, will make lots of them while raking in the origination fees.

These mortgages will be bundled and securitized.

.
.
.

well, you know how this turns out, right?


13 posted on 04/19/2011 9:38:41 AM PDT by Paine in the Neck (Napolean fries the idea powder.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

>>> Lenders would be required to make sure prospective borrowers have the ability to repay their mortgages before giving them a loan <<<

I would love to see how ‘Lenders’ are supposed to make borrowers ‘guarantee’ this? And how they are going to enforce it?

Once you sign on a loan application, you are a slave for that duration? You can not even lose a job, declare bankruptcy EVER?


17 posted on 04/19/2011 9:42:27 AM PDT by Sir Napsalot (Pravda + Useful Idiots = CCCP; JournOList + Useful Idiots = DopeyChangey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge
“the Dodd-Frank financial reform law”

The absurdity of attaching those two names to anything that promises sound lending practices cannot be exaggerated.

19 posted on 04/19/2011 9:43:25 AM PDT by SharpRightTurn (White, black, and red all over--America's affirmative action, metrosexual president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge
Fed unveils proposal on mortgage standards...Under the first scenario the loan could not include interest-only payments, a balloon payment and regular payments could not result in the principle of the loan increasing. Under the alternative, the loan would have to meet all the standards laid out under the first option and meet additional requirements such as having the lender verify a borrower's employment status and debt obligations.

According to the Congressional Black Criminal Caucus, that's racist!

20 posted on 04/19/2011 9:44:26 AM PDT by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

If I lie on my resume and get a job I am not qualified for, can I sue the employer? If I buy a car and am not a good driver, can I sue for any accidents I cause?


21 posted on 04/19/2011 9:44:30 AM PDT by posterchild
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge
...such as having the lender verify a borrower's employment status and debt obligations.

No Income, No Asset loans disappeared years ago, along with stated income and subprime loans (for the most part). And every lender we work with already verifies income, credit and assets.

Once again, the Fed is trying to regulate something that's already been taken care of, or is already being done. These folks really don't know their asses from a hole in the ground -- but I sure know which one smells worse.

23 posted on 04/19/2011 9:46:01 AM PDT by AnglePark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge
“Uhhh, a day late and trillions of dollars short.
Never have so many QuasiGubamintal Black Ops agencies worked so hard to destroy a nation and its underpinnings.
Hindsight is 20/20 they say.. Oversight is priceless..
Who put us in the mess, Ben? Fess up”

I'll say. The Federal Reserve has taken at least a Trillion of toxic Mortgage Backed Securities onto its books since Ben has been calling the shots. Not to mention another Trillion of US Treasury Notes and Bonds. The Federal Reserve needs to be audited. It is the largest ponzi scheme in the world, and, like all ponzi schemes, it will have a limited life and come crashing down.

26 posted on 04/19/2011 9:52:25 AM PDT by Gabrial (The Whitehouse Nightmare will continue as long as the Nightmare is in the Whitehouse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge
Under the first scenario the loan could not include interest-only payments, a balloon payment and regular payments could not result in the principle of the loan increasing.

Interesting how neither the author nor the "editors" at Reuters seemingly understand the difference between "principle" and "principal".

27 posted on 04/19/2011 9:52:25 AM PDT by Zeppo ("Happy Pony is on - and I'm NOT missing Happy Pony")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

By something you can’t afford—and sue the seller for it?


33 posted on 04/19/2011 10:01:42 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

it always was that way before affirmative action and the dems got involved in this stuff.


38 posted on 04/19/2011 10:26:07 AM PDT by television is just wrong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

And another way for the bureaucracy to get it’s barbs in deeper into business.


43 posted on 04/19/2011 1:15:40 PM PDT by b4its2late (Ignorance allows liberalism to prosper.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

It’s also going to be a breeding ground for lawsuits, when financial institution gives someone a loan for a house, and that person goes belly up, they’ll blame the lender for loaning them the money in the first place. Just watch that materialize.


44 posted on 04/19/2011 1:17:06 PM PDT by b4its2late (Ignorance allows liberalism to prosper.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson