Posted on 04/17/2011 3:33:21 PM PDT by Do Not Make Fun Of His Ears
This is a devastating analysis of Donald Trump from "The Great One." Mark Levin. And they are undeniably Trump's own words.
“But never, never shoot the messenger - and Trump is spreading the message that Obama is weak and how to take him down.”
YOU of all people are telling me not to shoot the messenger?!?!?!
ALL YOU HAVE DONE is hysterically trash Mark Levin on this thread and others. If anyone doubts me, go look at her past posts, it’s all there.
You are a real piece of work.
Jim........there are others on here that deserve the same. I’m so glad you joined in here!
Thank you, Jim!!!!!
Been posting the truth about Trump for the last 7-10 days, baldy. You rino-trumpsters just choose to ignore the facts. From Trump's book, "The America We Deserve, pages 31-32:
"I support a woman’s right to choose ..."
(“I believe it is a personal decision that should be left to the women and their doctors” Link)
page 102:
"The Republicans walk the NRA line and refuse even limited restrictions. I generally oppose gun control, but I support the ban on assault weapons and I support a slightly longer waiting period to purchase a gun".
pages 206-208 & 218:
"... the goal should be clear: Our people are our greatest asset. We must take care of our own. We must have universal healthcare. Our objective [should be] to make reforms for the moment and, longer term, to find an equivalent of the single-payer plan..."
Trumps last minute epiphany at CPAC2011 has no standing in merit. Pure BS. Trump remains pro-abortion, pro-gun control and supports universal health care and a single payer plan run by the feds. Trump is a liberal!
>>> Really? Then why were you trashing Levin without one word of criticism about Trump?
I said I didn’t trust Trump...
That he would have to do a much better job of convincing me that he has converted to conservatism.
If anything, I was trashing both of them... while validating what Levin was saying about Trump.
It has been bothering me for a long time, knowing how strongly Levin has always defended our constitution, and yet fails to see the importance of defending what it has to say about who is eligible to be president.
Something is seriously wrong with that.
I will never forget the abusive tongue lashing one of his callers got for even mentioning it.
I seriously do not understand why Levin is not a birther.
Someone please explain it to me without using that lame argument that it’s “not worth pursuing”.
We are headed for a serious constitutional crisis whether we like it or not... and ignoring the issue because it does not appear winnable is not acceptable. The crisis will still be here.
You didn't mean to lie -- I'll give you that now. But I'd admire you a whole helluva alot more if you just said, "Ooops! Sorry about that -- I stand corrected."
As for me, I stand corrected: you didn't lie, you were just talking out your ass. :^) Don't worry, I think we all do that sometimes; I know I sure have, and been caught here on FR and had to "stand corrected" myself. Your turn.
I’m not a Levin fan, I’m a Savage devotee, and there is a bit of tension between the two camps as everyone knows. That said, Levin is not only right to bring this stuff up, there can be no rational discussion regarding Trump’s true motivations without all the facts on the table, and a thorough cross examination regarding those facts.
Complete and utter nonsense.
Lots of fools with BC tunnel vision on this thread I see...
Meet Donald Trump, Sudden Right-Wing Conservative: Contributions, Abortion, Health Care, and Taxes
Donald Trump's Federal Campaign Contribution Report (Rats and RINOs)
Donald Trump vs. Donald Trump: The Difference a Decade Makes
Casino Reinvestment Development Authority v. Coking The Abuse of Eminent Domain in Atlantic City
>>> Man up. You should have written “Unless I’m mistaken, Levin is ...” or “I don’t know for sure, but I seem to remember that Levin is a self-professed atheist ...”,
I do believe I have already admitted that.
Until your posts of the past two days, I’ve never discussed Mark Levin on Free Republic, or anywhere else.
Trying to paint me as hysterical is silly, as all I’m pointing out is Mark Levin’s illogical attempt to trash a man who is, in fact, exposing the fraudster in the White House. So why isn’t Levin as successful as Trump at doing that?
Donald Trump is drawing public attention to Obama’s questionable past. There hasn’t been anyone else, except maybe Savage, in the whole of the pantheon of conservative radio hosts who has done as much to excite potential voters.
Levin has been disabusing potential future Republican voters of listening to Trump by talking about Trump’s checkered business and political past.
WOW! Great way, Mark Levin, to help Obama.
I’ve had to eat crow too. Recently in fact, here on FR. We all do.
No biggie, you’re forgiven.
Anyway, all I wanted was for the clips to be heard objectively, and suddenly the whole thread became “attack the messenger” (me AND levin). Lol
No, I agree that the birther issue is huge. And I applaud Trump for having the guts to pursue it. It’s doing great damage to Obama, and I don’t get why our side is afraid of it.
Bur that said, what I DON’T want to happen is for all this zeal to morph into a swell of support for Trump the Candidate when and if he announces, with no scrutiny of him.
Because up until another FReeper posted these clips, I was excited that maybe Trump was Da Man.
I have been convinced otherwise, in fact I’m gravely concerned, particularly withhis past support of universal healthcare (not Obamacare),, which I have yet to hear him renounce.
He deserves close scrutiny, and I don’t like what I see.
Take care and God bless.
Both The Donald and Reagan have one thing in common, they both have changed their positions on abortion. You’ve posted Trumps prior position, so I don’t need to do that, but here is commentary on Reagan’s prior position:
Allowed abortion as CA Gov.; didn’t push pro-life as Pres.
Reagan was not as obsessive about anti-abortion legislation as he often seemed. Early in his California governorship he had signed a permissive abortion bill that has resulted in more than a million abortions. Afterward, he inaccurately blamed this outcome on doctors, saying that they had deliberately misinterpreted the law. When Reagan ran for president, he won backing from pro-life forces by advocating a constitutional amendment that would have prohibited all abortions except when necessary to save the life of the mother. Reagan’s stand was partly a product of political calculation, as was his tactic after he was elected of addressing the annual pro-life rally held in Washington by telephone so that he would not be seen with the leaders of the movement on the evening news. While I do not doubt Reagan’s sincerity in advocating an anti-abortion amendment, he invested few political resources toward obtaining this goal.
Source: The Role of a Lifetime, by Lou Cannon, p. 812 Jul 2, 1991
After his conversion, Reagan became a strong Pro-Life supporter.
You (understandably) didn’t post anything about Trumps conversion, so here is a short blurb: “Business mogul Donald Trump shocked attendees at the conservative CPAC conference in February when he declared himself pro-life after years of supporting the pro-abortion position.”
You can read more about it here at LifeNews.com http://www.lifenews.com/2011/04/08/donald-trump-explains-conversion-to-pro-life-side-on-abortion/
After his conversion, just as with Reagan, Trump has become a Pro-Life man.
And what’s with the ‘baldy’ reference? Are you so insecure about your positions that you can’t even be respectful to those you disagree with?
Actually, if you knew anything about Mark Levin (which you don't), then you would realize that Sean Hannity gave him that moniker.
Your ignorance shows once again...
You did not listen to the clips. Its obvious.
Hehe.
Thank you. Well said.
Has his own prob’s.Yikes.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.