Posted on 04/16/2011 8:57:04 AM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner
Look how Chump operates. Caught red-handed now with his vicious attacks on George Bush, who most conservatives had issues with, he now says but for Bush there would have likely been no Obama. That may well be true. I have been a harsh critic of Bush's spending, including in my book. But Chump was calling Bush EVIL and demanded his IMPEACHMENT because of the Iraq war and in the middle of that war. He said Bush lied to get us into Iraq. His comments were vile and outrageous, not unlike the America-hating leftists who sought to undermine are armed forces there. Now he wants us to believe that his criticism of Bush was because Bush's poor record set the stage for Obama? Chump attacked Bush over Iraq because if you were a big-mouth, attention-seeking liberal, it was the thing to do. He had no altruistic or principled conservative motive for doing so at the time and expressed none.
As recently as last year, while conservatives and Tea Party activists were organizing and rallying against Obama, Pelosi, Reid and their radical agenda, Chump was helping to fund some our opponents. He contributed to left-wing, Tea Party-hating menaces like Chuck Schumer, Anthony Weiner, and Harry Reid. What about his contributions to Charlie Crist, while Crist was running against Marco Rubio? Did he donate to any of the Tea Party candidates? Did he contribute to the Tea Party movement in any way, with time or money, before today? Why not?
Chump also praised Nancy Pelosi. He thought she was great. I played the audio. I guess he was just mistaken, again. He supported universal health care, but not any more, of course. He supported abortion and gay marriage, but that was then, this is now. He supported John Kerry for president in 2004, but that's because Bush was so evil. He leaned on government officials to use eminent domain against a little old lady whose home happened to be in the way of a parking lot he wanted to build for one of his casinos in Atlantic City, but he has always been for private property rights.
So now Chump rails against China and demands Obama's birth certificate and we are supposed to swoon over the man. But when asked about the Ryan budget, he turns stupid again -- he says Ryan should not take the lead on this, we need a bipartisan consensus to move forward? And with whom do we build this bipartisan consensus? Reid? Obama? Is Chump really this dumb, or is he, once again, trying to figure out which way the wind is blowing?
Chump is a phony and dissembling. He called a hastily organized press event this morning because I, and others, are on to him.
TRENDING: Trump lashes out at George W. Bush and Obama
Today he is speaking at a local Tea Party rally. And why? Because now he wants our support, not because he supports us or our principles, or ever did. Chump is about Chump. And he thinks we're too stupid to notice. Are we?
All these smarmy attacks on Trump would mean a lot more, if there were even one other Republican going after Obama like Trump is.
There isn’t.
Not one.
People can say what they want about Trump. But he’s the first person to EFFECTIVELY point out that the Emperor has no clothes. When I say effectively, I mean that he’s thrown down the gauntlet and challenged the Marxist-controlled media in such a way that they’ve been unable to ignore him, intimidate him, or denigrate him.
Quite frankly, Obama and the Marxist-controlled media are petrified of Trump because he has the resources to truly dig up the dirt on Obama, which they all know is not that difficult since they’ve been covering this stuff up for Obama for years. Furthermore, they know Trump won’t hesitate to back a dump truck up to front gate of the White House and dump that big heaping pile of dirt right on Obama’s doorstep.
Most of the rest of the GOP have been scared to mention that the Emperor has no clothes, and the few that have mentioned it have done so trepidatiously and have retreated at the first sign of being labeled a “birther”.
At this point I say, “More power to The Donald!”
Its a classic theory of military engagements - a false flag carrier sets himself up as being on your team, raises the false flag, then leads whoever is uncritically fixated on that flag off from the main battle front. This isolates the deceived troops, making them more vulnerable and weakening the main contingent by depriving them of needed manpower. And it just doesn’t work if A) the false flag doesn’t look pretty real from a distance, and B) the raiser of the false flag fails to get the attention of the targeted troops. Mark, others here, and myself, are sounding the alarm that Trump is indeed a false flag operation, and so far a very successful one at that. We can’t let that success continue if we really want to win in 2012. Much of the battle now depends on all of us staying together and not diluting our own force. Let Trump say all he wants about the BC (though you may notice he’s not as focused on eligibility per se as a true eligibility skeptic should be). But let’s not give him the GOP nomination as a reward for his apparent bravado. He’s not one of us, and he’s not for us. He’s for Donald “The Beauty of Me” Trump. False flag all the way.
Well I am. I am no fan of Trump, but attacking Trump because he thought that Bush's deranged middle east policy was diranged does not give me confidence in Levin's ability to perceive what is right and what is wrong in the US.
Thank you Mark Levin, for posting this.
Have you seen this. Just came out this morning. Trump’s political adviser is none other than Michael Cohen- a rabid leftist.
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/donald-trumps-political-pit-bull-meet-michael-cohen/story?id=13386747
Normally I don’t like “I told you so” moments, but I am looking forward to this one with all of the Trumpologists.
Yes, that is Michael Cohen who is on George Soros’s “New America Foundation”.
http://www.newamerica.net/people/michael_a_cohen
Ping #66- if you want more Soros/Trump connections, Trump’s political adviser is on Soros’ New America Foundation.
In other words, you support government-run universal healthcare just like Trump supports it.
Why do you think Hillary should be Commander in Chief?
“Remember the article back in November in the Huffington Post (we can’t post here) Soros had said he had given up on Obama and was looking elsewhere. A lot of the speculation was Trump. ...” ~ mnehring
The “Co-Opt the Tea Party Movement” being put into practice by Trump?
Sounds quite plausible to me!
Trent Lott [R] on Tea Party candidates: ‘As soon as they get here, we need to co-opt them’
http://blogs.ajc.com/jay-bookman-blog/2010/07/19/trent-lott-on-tea-party-candidates-as-soon-as-they-get-here-we-need-to-co-opt-them/
12:27 pm July 19, 2010, by Jay
The money quote from a Washington Post piece on the Tea Party and Washington’s GOP establishment:
Former Senate majority leader Trent Lott (R-Miss.), now a D.C. lobbyist, warned that a robust bloc of rabble-rousers spells further Senate dysfunction. “We don’t need a lot of Jim DeMint disciples,” Lott said in an interview. “As soon as they get here, we need to co-opt them.” But Lott said he’s not expecting a tea-party sweep. “I still have faith in the visceral judgment of the American people,” he said.
How can you say doing the opposite of what Rove would do is “acting like Karl Rove?”
Check out #66
Vera Coking, an elderly widow from Atlantic City, knows firsthand the power of unaccountable government agencies. The Institute for Justice successfully defended Vera against the condemnation of her home by a State agency that sought to take her property and transfer it—at a bargain-basement price—to another private individual: Donald Trump. Trump convinced the State agency to use its “eminent domain” power to take Vera’s home so he could construct a limousine parking lot for his customers—hardly a public purpose.Thanks to IJ’s advocacy, Vera Coking won in court and continues to enjoy her home of more than three decades.
Source here.
More than that—Trump wanted Hillary to be Commander in Chief. This is indefensible, and I have yet to see the Trump trolls on FR utter one breath about it.
Same temperament, same ego, same spoiler disposition, same narcissistic personality, different hair!
Trump will reelect Obama, never doubt me.
Seems to this poster that Trump is receiving the Christine O’Donnell treatment.
Maybe I’m just enthused that (finally) someone is taking the fight right to Obama.
Trump is doing good things right now.
There are some small hints he may be a Trojan Horse - such as post 66 - but for as long as he’s out front taking on Obama (while nobody else will) then I’ll take his side.
Could be he’s after Obama, to clear the way for Rodham. He’ll take no votes from the GOP that way, so as far as I can see there’s no downside right now to backing him 100%.
If he so much as says one word against Palin, I’ll not say one more thing ever, in his defense.
Yes, that is Michael Cohen who is on George Soros’s “New America Foundation”.
Trump has verbally and financially supported politicians who have been actively undermining the Constitution for decades. Were it not for those very same politicians (Reid, Pelosi and Schumer), Obama would be a lame-duck one-termer with very little help in Congress to pass his moronic agenda. Maybe Trump's support for those turds was "good business" for Trump, but it screwed the rest of us.
I'll enjoy his side-show for as long as it lasts, but I'll never vote for, or support him.
Hey! “Hold on now”!!
What is the one thing that has allowed Trump to rise like this? Huh? Could it be because no one else (aside from our internet heros) would bring up the birth question? Even you — a constitutional lawyer?
Could it be that conservatives were waiting for ANYONE to make an issue of it? And not just the birth, but the whole rise of the fraud, and aided and abetted by who knows who.
Where were you and so many other conservative pundits? And don’t bring up that it wasn’t important when compared to the economy and such. I can walk and chew gum and read my BlackBerry at the same time. Can’t you?
I’m not saying what you are saying isn’t so -— but his rise in the polls is because of just one thing — the birth question! Where have you and all our other conservative ‘heros’ been??
People are liking the straight talk on the birth issue and Trump is the only one (of those looking to run) who is doing it. No PC sidesteps -— just laying it on the line. If just one of them would bring up the questions that surround Obama, then THEY would have our attention. But no one is doing it. They have paved the way for Trump.
And one last thing — why haven’t YOU said anything about all the Obama questions?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.