Posted on 04/14/2011 2:43:32 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Keith Olbermann is not known for his candor. In a sense, it‘s what’s made him a popular figure on the left. And sure, he makes off-the-wall comments sometimes in order to evoke a response. But he may have gone too far today when he suggested that conservative commentator S.E. Cupp is a prime example of why the world needs Planned Parenthood (PP). Translation, she should have never been born.
Immediately, the comment drew fire from those who said Olbermann, the former MSNBC host turned Current TV commentator, insinuated Cupp should have been aborted. And just as quickly, Olbermann started treading water.
Here’s how it went down.
Olbermann’s initial comment, via Twitter, was a response to a tweet from a follower who pointed out that on Joy Behar’s show last night, Cupp said she wasn’t a fan of supporting Planned Parenthood. That elicited this response:
(Excerpt) Read more at theblaze.com ...
I didn’t read it, The Blaze get no hits from me.
Why would anyone be surprised or shocked by leftist sentiments from Keith Olbermann?
Did you expect something different?
Stay classy, Keith.
One difference between Olbermann and Cupp is that, in ten years, college kids at that time will know who Cupp is.
Even the unshaven, smelly, Birkenstock wearing harpies from his own party scare him. He has this mommy/son sickness and has mommy give him a bath every night.
Mrs. Olbermann obviously made an unfortunate “choice.”
MSNBC’s Keith Olbermann likened Michelle Malkin to a “big mashed up bag of meat with lipstick” and railed about her “fascistic hatred.”
GMTA...... please read post #23.
Wait. SE Cupp is a tranny?
I just read half a dozen different biographies of her and not one mentioned such a thing. I’m skeptical.
Keith Olbermann is a person who makes a good case for retroactive abortions at any time during the lifetime of the user of the cadaver..
I believe the only person more hateful and self-loathing than Olberman would be the person that signed up to follow him on Twitter.
Olbermann, like many other Liberal males, needs a good old fashioned knuckle sandwich.
Every time Olby opens his mouth, it proves the need for duct tape.
Well I think that it’s transgendered when they have surgery (not sure) and tranny usually means transvestite which I thought meant wearing the clothing/makeup without surgery.
Generally, yes, she was writing under both her male name and her new name, S. E. Cupp for an online paper. One of the newspapers readers wrote complaining to her that lately she had ‘gotten’ to write columns and the ‘better writer’ (her but writing under her former male name) was therefore being displaced. S. E. Cupp then wrote to explain that the two writers were both her.
http://www.mediabistro.com/fishbowldc/matt-labash-comes-out-of-the-closet-as-s-e-cupp_b20351
Matt Labash Comes Out of the Closet as S.E. Cupp
I’m not sure how you jump from “she wrote using a man’s name” to “she was born a man and changed to a woman”. I heard her say one time that she wrote with the name “S.E.” because she found that if people thought a man was the author her writings were taken more seriously than if written by “Sarah Elizabeth”.
I’ve seen her pictures many times and knew that she was a male but always found her 100% visually female. Until I looked at the picture you posted. This time I notice her chin/jaw and nose. Very strong lower jaw.
This is a better link: http://dailycaller.com/2010/08/24/ask-matt-labash-vol-xxvi-dark-secrets-revealed-the-moral-failure-of-fly-tying-and-travels-with-the-jo-bros/
I can see I had the original ‘reader complains’ aspect wrong. The reader asked why Matt Labash was more prolific then S.E. Cupp.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.