When I said you didn’t “address” my points means you didn’t try to refute them! You didn’t tell me how I am wrong! Because you can’t.
Since when is Beck or any other MSM person “our” resources? First of all, you think me or any other Constitutionalist can influence Beck? Who does influence Beck? Whoever he chooses to get influenced by, most likely the man who signs his checks. They say “Don’t touch that issue”, so he won’t touch it.
I wonder what you think “our” resources, in connection with the MSM, you mean.
And for the love of all that is holy, it’s not merely the birth certificiate issue! It’s eveyrthing that he is lying about! It’s his eligibility.
I am starting to really wonder about you. “Our” resoureces - like the MSM is a resources of you and your friends? It’s owned and controlled by freaking leftists! What anyone says on FR doens’t influence them! They’re in 0h0mo’s and his fellow leftists’ pockets for crying out loud.
Ok, let's try again. My point is that there are better issues to focus on than the birth certificate issue. Do you agree?
Related to this point, the birth certificate issue is a valid concern. Do you agree?
Talking about the birth certificate issue makes this issue dominent in the media, making it easier for the MSM to ignore other issues that are more important, like the financial crash the U.S. is headed for because of runaway government spending. Do you agree?
Those are the points I have made. I have made any statement to disagree with your point that the media is liberal - which it most certainly is.
You seem to be saying I am not responding to is your statement that the MSM is liberal. You get no argument from me on that point. I agree.
So what is it that you have said that I have not responded to?