I think it needs to be amended to specifically give registered voters standing to challenge the SOS’s eligibility decision and legal authorization to subpoena all birth and citizenship records for the candidate in question - including the transaction logs and complete vital records history which alone would show whether the records have been manipulated.
Either that, or flat-out require the SOS to subpoena all the birth and citizenship records and their transaction logs and complete vital records history.
The value of granting legal standing to registered voters is that NBC can be brought before a court, rather than having a SOS who is not trained in the Constitution make such a decision. It also means that the records will be more likely to get non-politicized scrutiny. It also keeps the SOS accountable, which is important when Soros has already targeted that position to be filled with America haters. It also means that even if Obama claims he can’t get his BC because Hawaii is breaking their UIPA law by denying individuals access to their own records, those records can still be accessed because Hawaii still has to follow another state’s subpoenas.
For a million reasons, specifically giving registered voters legal standing to challenge in court the eligibility of a candidate - and specifically to subpoena the records needed to catch any records manipulation regarding birth and citizenship - is what is needed.
A person who is not at this moment in time a US citizen cannot be a “natural born citizen”. Both birth and citizenship records are critical. In an eligibility lawsuit that is heard on the merits, with discovery of critical records allowed, ALL the relevant facts can/should be addressed. And that is what we need.
Have you spoken to the main sponsor of the bill? Rep. Carl Seel? Speaking to his office right now might have a positive effect as the bill out of the senate now goes back to their house...
“4.If you are a citizen of the great State of Arizona, you will specifically have standing in terms of being able to enforce this legislation. This, of course, is a pretty big deal, and could, in theory, lead to a class-action status of a multitude of citizens standing up against a given candidate if they do not feel that candidate’s background is sufficiently substantial;”
8. Permits a member of the House of Representatives, a member of the Senate or any other citizen of this state to initiate an action to enforce this section.
It all becomes public record. In order for any citizen of AZ to challenge the documentation by the presidential candidates it has to become public.