I'll report back later when I find out whomever it is that the Islamic Science Monitor says that the Arab world should be arming against the Western nations sticking their noses into Libya's civil war.
Time to arm Al Qaeda: Here’s how
Libya is a lose-lose proposition and has been from the start. We either side with a brutal dictator or the muslime bruthahuud. It is like choosing between death by strangulation or poisoning. Either way you’re dead.
We have no stake in what happens in Libya so we need to stay the hell out of there. Let the europeans fight this one out without us propping them up, they are the ones who need Libya’s oil, not us.
Don’t worry, Angel, al Qaeda and the Iranian fanatics are already arming them. Where do you think they got all those nifty Toyota pickup trucks with rockets and machine guns mounted in the back?
The Christian Science Monitor has been, basically, just another left-wing rag for decades. Mary Baker Eddy would be shocked, shocked, at this war-mongering idiocy.
Somebody needs to tell the Christian Science Monitor that our credibility is already diminished.
According the Libs, they will be able to arm up and no one will ask them for as much as an ID.
Come to think of it, after they leave the Gun Show, they can go down to the local Polling Place and Vote for their favorite Democrat. No ID needed there either.
If they decide to stick around, they might as well run for President. No Birth Certificate required.
No, this is "Christian Science" Monitor. Christian Science and Christianity are different religions.
Christian Science consider evil to be an illusion and it shows.
Our only wars from now on should be wars of conquest. If we break it, we TAKE it. Otherwise we simply can’t afford to.
Some real reason why I should be paying to arm the slammite brotherhood???????
I’m all for it, but only if we arm the other side as well. (In VERY small quanties, and munitions that have a very short shelflife.) We want them to kill each other, not save munitions to use against us later.
I’m all for it, but only if we arm the other side as well. (In VERY small quanties, and munitions that have a very short shelflife.) We want them to kill each other, not save munitions to use against us later.
Yep. You give these primitive savages weapons and they are just as likely to kill each other and Westerners as anyone else.
When two groups meet to ‘take a village’, they are just as likely to start shooting at each other as they are to actually accomplish any military goal.
They will use the guns to settle old debts and feuds, rape and rob, and setup roadblocks to extort money from passers by. Muslims do it every time.
These people are savages and no amount of bleeding heart Liberal wishful thinking is going to change that.
This morning the Muslim Brotherhood warned the United States that if the United States meddling in Libya continued they intend to cut off America’s supply of 7-11 and Motel 6 managers.
If this action does not yield sufficient results, cab drivers will be next, followed by Dell, AT&T, Dish, AOL, American Express, Master Card and Visa customer service reps.
Finally, if all else fails, they have threatened not to send us any more presidents either.
What a crock, same thing as saying we need to kill people to feel manly. Sometime, you need to admit you screwed up and walk away.
Well, here’s the problem with the Middle East: We should have realized that you play for both sides, and make sure both sides of Libya fight each other above all else. With all the time fighting each other, how are they supposed to turn back to get us?
Time to equip the Libyan allies of our enemies in Afghanistan. Here’s how.
Once again, how convenient it is for 0bama that budget matters took Libya off the front pages.
Well, a few of us are still watching, and we’re seeing the U.S. become entangled in a no-win quagmire. So, we’ve gone from a no-fly zone ostensibly to protect civilians, to striking Libyan Army ground assets, to putting CIA operatives in-country, to arming the al-Qaeda “rebels,” to (and we KNOW it’s headed in this direction) American ground troops.
And not even so much as a weak bleat of protest from the meek, submissive lot called the “American people.”