Posted on 04/13/2011 3:02:23 AM PDT by Scanian
The darkest hour is just before dawn. A huge swath of this planet, from the Straits of Gibraltar to the Philippine Sea, has been held in a synthetic,forced nightfall for nearly fourteen centuries. But the sunrise is coming, it is coming sooner rather than later, and this light will be the life of men.
Everywhere in the western world, people look at the savage violence that is a daily occurrence in the Muslim world and shake their heads in stunned disbelief. A pastor of a very small Christian flock in Florida burns a Koran. Weeks later at literally the global antipode, Muslim imams drive through neighborhoods in a vehicle with loudspeakers attached, calling the townsfolk to riot. The townsfolk respond, and before it is all over, at least 22 innocent people are dead at the hands of these townsfolk, with at least two of them beheaded. How is this possible? How can this be? How can human behavior and culture be so monstrously different? Is this difference attributable to nothing more than environmental nurture theory?
No. There is something else. There is a catalyst -- absent in every other culture on earth -- that has poisoned the cultural soil, thus yielding the fruit of bad harvest for nearly 1,400 years. That catalyst is inbreeding. As a direct result, the Muslim population is mentally developmentally disabled on a mass scale.
All human cultures display strict prohibitions against inbreeding and consanguineous marriage. Incest is a universal taboo. This is a transcendent anthropological fact. As a Roman Catholic, I attribute this to what is called "The Natural Law." Every human person without exception is created by God with a deep, innate knowledge of good and evil, right and wrong. Stabbing someone in the neck for no reason whatsoever is just as wrong here
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
This is worth reading, there is more information.
Saudi Arabia has the reputation of being the worst though they keep their defective kids in the “closet” away from scrutiny.
The Arabs know the problem, yet they persist in it.
Distrust of “outsiders” is usually given as the reason for such stupid tribalism.
And considering that the “outsiders” are other Muslims, the distrust is justified.
Years ago a Syrian lady asked my mother why I didn't marry my first cousin, whose family had a lot of money.
My mother said ‘We don't do that’.
The Syrian lady couldn't understand why we let all that money go ‘out of the family’. Money is part of it as well.
Interesting article, but it begs the question: If the Muslims are breeding themselves into potential extinction, why on Earth would I want that to stop?
The incest/genetic defect problem among Muslims is certainly undeniable. The statistics are pretty damning. I was impressed by the fact that they have 1/3 of the births with genetic defects in the UK - and only 3% of the population.
Unfortunately, they’re not breeding themselves out of existence, simply into a progressively more dysfunctional and low-IQ condition. But their fertility rate seems to be the only thing unaffected by this.
Nature will find a way.
And all along I thought their keystone was beastly brutality. Wow, so much to build on...
“The incest/genetic defect problem among Muslims is certainly undeniable. The statistics are pretty damning. I was impressed by the fact that they have 1/3 of the births with genetic defects in the UK - and only 3% of the population.”
The Brits might want to conduct a census if they think only 3% of their country is Muslim. Ever been to London? Heck, they imported more than that number alone in the past two decades (2.7 million, to be exact), and it’s not like those animals are fertile.
Oh, sure.
If they have any money, they’ll try to hold onto it that way and not “let it leave the family.”
But the tyical unemployed, dirt-poor “Arab Street” derelicts don’t give the impression of having much, if any, property.
But you never can tell-—that’s for sure.
The DuPonts might stand out as an interesting case study because they had a good thing going with the company, the city, and the state, which was virtually a DuPont estate. There were clear incentives to keep things in the family. I suppose the same thing has happened many times over the years when aristocracies of land, wealth, or status start to get a little clannish. You don't have to go the full Deliverance route to see the effects. I don't know enough about Muslim societies to comment, but the thesis is intriguing.
Note the author appears to be the producer of the bacon-bookmarked-Koran-burning video, also.
Same name, anyway.
There will be humans left. Or there will be muslims. It’s that simple.
It is much more than that...Think seriously about islamic laws concerning women...they are slaves period! They have no rights and are the spawn of the devil....great way to start out life.
If a father has any love for a daughter there is only one way to oversee somewhat her safety and that is to keep her in the family where he can cause enough trouble to keep her husband treating her well...If he marries her outside the family he can not keep her safe...so any father who has a smidgen of love for a daughter under islam must keep her close.
Like usual islam is the problem and the cause of the evil in the muslim world. It is a religion that needs wiping out for nothing good and wholesome springs from it.
No, they are not breeding themselves out of existence. Think of our own stereotypes of Appalachia, which actually has some basis in fact. They (in)breed like rabbits and show signs of genetic defects. And some of the manifestations of those defects are lower intelligence and being prone to random violence.
The Clampetts were muslims at heart. And got their money from oil, too.
For a good idea of the beneficial effects of introducing new blood into a family, look at Prince Charles versus his sons.
Diana wasn’t royalty, but she very obviously had good genes. Probably because she wasn’t royalty.
I am just saying that sometimes the motive is money as well as custom.
However, I am sure that most of the people practicing THIS ‘custom’ are desperately poor. They are so demoralized and uneducated that challenging the tradition of centuries is terrifying, if it is thinkable at all.
The more we know about the Muslim culture/religion, the more backward and de-humanizing it is. In truth, Islam is NOT a faith but rather a system of tyranny.
The surest and most complete way to gain and wield tyranny over people is to de-humanize them to the point of abject servitude. The historic record is bursting with examples of this. Where Islam is concerned… servitude to the ‘idea’ of faith and to obedience always was, and remains, the means to achieve and exercise permanent and absolute power.
Humanity is hobbled like this. For Western cultures, it has been warfare, disease, poverty, oppression, ignorance… most of which are by now, overcome. However, entire populations in the ME have for centuries been stunted by Islam. The obstacles to human development THERE are suffocating and insurmountable.
Who knows… maybe the guy who was going to find the cure for cancer was killed in one of their mindless Jihads… maybe the woman who could advance the cure for AIDS is sitting at home with a sheet on her head….etc. It is positively criminal for Muslims to call their ‘system’ fair or good. NOTHING which SO cripples the human spirit is either fair or good!!!
I can recall a passage in “Gone with the Wind” in which Scarlett’s father, I believe, extolls the virtue and success of Charleston families who retain their strength by marrying their cousins.
Along with retardation being multiplied through incest, talent can likewise be multiplied. The advocates of cousin-marrying likely think about the winners and ignore the losers.
All I can say is ... wow! Not sure that I have read a more disturbing piece in a long, long time.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.