Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RummyChick

BTW, it looks like my speculation in another forum that the big radiation release could have been from the #4 pool may be wrong: “Authorities said much of the high-level radiation leaked from reactor 2 on March 15 and 16, early in the accident. Abnormalities in the reactor’s suppression pool caused the radiation release, the Japan Nuclear Safety Commission said. Radiation continues to leak from the suppression pool, the commission said, but the volume has dropped considerably.”

Reactor 2 is the one that didn’t have its building blow up, because it didn’t have high reactor pressure that had to be vented, and it has been assumed that it had a breach in the suppression pool. This is further indication of such a breach.


88 posted on 04/12/2011 9:01:14 PM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]


To: CharlesWayneCT

Here is what an EXPERT..yes EXPERT..who helped design the reactor at Fukushima had to say about this whole incident.

Could it have been avoided...Seems likely

http://www.examiner.com/wilderness-photography-in-eugene/fukushima-the-path-not-taken-1

http://www.examiner.com/wilderness-photography-in-eugene/fukushima-one-path-to-success

http://www.examiner.com/wilderness-photography-in-eugene/fukushima-engineer-oregon


89 posted on 04/12/2011 9:10:57 PM PDT by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson