To: Oldeconomybuyer
70 years of big growth of government, communizing of America, getting each generation dumbed down to accept communism, owning all the educational and media establishments, getting government to support 50 million abortions, running the annual deficit up by $1 TRILLION per year in Ocrapper’s first year in office.
We just shaved off 4 days of 2011 borrowing at current deficit rates.
They have succeeded in totally destroying America and what it stood for. What in the world do they have to be disheartened about? Do they want to totally destroy the U.S. and hand it over to our enemies all in one year?
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Cutting 38 billion dollars from the federal budget is about as significant as getting a haircut to lose weight.
8 posted on
04/09/2011 6:04:07 PM PDT by
muir_redwoods
(Obama. Chauncey Gardiner without the homburg.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
What do they have to be disheartened about, the Republicans & Tea Party with “spending cuts” are saving the country and their sorry arses. They're deaf, dumb and blind.
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Yep...liberals are angry that Boehner got most of the cuts he wanted for 2011. And that's after the Dems never passed a budget so this was SUPPOSED to be a Dem bill.
To: Oldeconomybuyer; All
13 posted on
04/09/2011 6:27:49 PM PDT by
musicman
(Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Princeton University professor Paul Krugman noted that by agreeing to this level of budget cuts, Obama had accepted the premise that the economy has recovered enough to withstand the withdrawal of federal spending. Typical liberal brain dead response. Government spending is what caused the frickin' depression. The less we do of it, the quicker the economy will recover.
16 posted on
04/09/2011 6:36:55 PM PDT by
calex59
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Maybe someone can ping all the naysayers...
18 posted on
04/09/2011 6:39:16 PM PDT by
Crim
(Palin / West '12)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
“he gave in to Republican demands for tax cuts, Krugman said
BS, Paul. The Dems had 60% majorities in both houses and the President signed it into law. Those weren’t GOP cuts. They were Democrat cuts.
To: Oldeconomybuyer
If Krugman says it’s bad, that means it’s good!
20 posted on
04/09/2011 7:13:52 PM PDT by
Forgiven_Sinner
(Seek you first the kingdom of God, and all things will be given to you.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
and the RATS, take another one in the.........HA ha!!!
![](http://www.graveyardgraphics.com/big%20red%20X%201.JPG)
21 posted on
04/09/2011 7:30:39 PM PDT by
Chode
(American Hedonist - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
The problem though is that theres a time to cut the budget, which is when the economy is doing really well, Greenwald said in an interview Saturday afternoon. The difference between the Republicans and Democrats is that [Democrats believe] during economically difficult times you need government spending. what a stupid philosophy... that's like saying when my husband loses his job, we spend more because times are difficult... when times are really good for us financially, we make cuts in our spending... does he hear himself?
25 posted on
04/09/2011 8:53:54 PM PDT by
latina4dubya
( self-proclaimed tequila snob)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson