Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jurors reach verdict in trial of Castro's nemesis
AP ^ | 4/08/2011

Posted on 04/08/2011 12:15:17 PM PDT by cll

EL PASO, Texas (AP) — Texas jurors have reached a quick verdict in the federal trial of a Cuban anti-communist militant considered ex-President Fidel Castro's nemesis.

A court clerk in El Paso says jurors reached a verdict Friday after less than a day of deliberations.

Eighty-three-year-old Luis Posada Carriles (loo-EES' poh-SAH'-duh cah-REE'-lehs) is an ex-CIA operative who opposed Castro and communist governments around Latin America — often with U.S. support.

But he sneaked into the U.S. in 2005 and faces perjury, obstruction and immigration fraud charges.

(Excerpt) Read more at google.com ...


TOPICS: Cuba; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government
KEYWORDS: cia; posada; posadacarriles
Not guilty.
1 posted on 04/08/2011 12:15:22 PM PDT by cll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: cll

Per Fox News Radio.


2 posted on 04/08/2011 12:15:59 PM PDT by cll (I am the warrant and the sanction)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cll
But he sneaked into the U.S. in 2005 and faces perjury, obstruction and immigration fraud charges.

Somewhat different from how the libs treat an illegal who commits an ordinary crime without an anti-communist slant. I miss the old days when "justice is blind" to all but the facts of the case was an ideal that both political parties held sacred.



3 posted on 04/08/2011 12:21:22 PM PDT by Pollster1 (Natural born citizen of the USA, with the birth certificate to prove it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pollster1
...old days...

There in lies the problem; this here is the new Hoped & Changed America! Welcome!
4 posted on 04/08/2011 12:23:07 PM PDT by ExTxMarine ("Convictions are more dangerous to truth than lies." ~ F. Nietzsche)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: cll
EL PASO, Texas (AP) — Texas jurors have reached a quick verdict in the federal trial of a Cuban anti-communist militant considered ex-President Fidel Castro's nemesis.

Story says the jury reached a verdict. Nowhere can I see in the story what's the verdict. Also, isn't the past tense of sneak snuck? Who writes these stories? The computer?

5 posted on 04/08/2011 12:29:36 PM PDT by LoneRangerMassachusetts (The meek shall not inherit the Earth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LoneRangerMassachusetts

Fox News Radio announced the not guilty verdict at the top of the hour. When I went to look for a linkable story, this is the closest they had. It has since been updated.

http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/ap/top/all/7513316.html


6 posted on 04/08/2011 12:35:30 PM PDT by cll (I am the warrant and the sanction)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: cll

Millions of Hispanics come into the country illegally every year and get free benefits, and they prosecute an 83-year-old Cuban patriot because he tried to help the CIA against Castro?

Typical.


7 posted on 04/08/2011 12:37:27 PM PDT by Cicero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LoneRangerMassachusetts

“Also, isn’t the past tense of sneak snuck? “


Actually, “sneaked” is the standard past tense of “sneak” (although “snuck” has been pretty much accepted of late):

—Usage note
First recorded in writing toward the end of the 19th century in the United States, snuck has become in recent decades a standard variant past tense and past participle of the verb sneak : Bored by the lecture, he snuck out the side door. Snuck occurs frequently in fiction and in journalistic writing as well as on radio and television: In the darkness the sloop had snuck around the headland, out of firing range. It is not so common in highly formal or belletristic writing, where sneaked is more likely to occur. Snuck is the only spoken past tense and past participle for many younger and middle-aged persons of all educational levels in the U. S. and Canada. Snuck has occasionally been considered nonstandard, but it is so widely used by professional writers and educated speakers that it can no longer be so regarded.

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/sneak


8 posted on 04/08/2011 2:23:03 PM PDT by AuH2ORepublican (If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what makes you think that he'll protect your rights?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

“Millions of Hispanics come into the country illegally every year and get free benefits, and they prosecute an 83-year-old Cuban patriot because he tried to help the CIA against Castro?”


Not only that, but since the Cuba Adjustment Act automatically grants asylum to Cubans who reach the U.S. The only reason why Posada Carriles could be deemed to have entered the U.S. “illegally” is if he is no longer deemed a Cuban national due to his adoption of Venezuelan citizenship some years ago.

And to make Posada Carriles the one guy who gets prosecuted for sneaking into the U.S.? Ridiculous.


9 posted on 04/08/2011 2:43:49 PM PDT by AuH2ORepublican (If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what makes you think that he'll protect your rights?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson