[KarlInOhio]

Prosser could push the justice’s lead beyond the legal threshold that would trigger an automatic recount. Under state law, Kloppenburg could still ask for a recount up to three days after the official canvass, but would have to pay for it herself.

Not a problem. The unions will pick up the tab.

Although I'm glad Prosser is ahead, I am concerned about how this type of sloppy mistake can be made. We wouldn't accept this type of error from a two branch library system, but these seemingly random numbers are a common occurrence in our electoral system in far too many elections and it gives a huge opening for the creative counters in the Democrat party to steal elections.

[dfwgator]

We need accounting firms to handle elections, if it’s good enough for the Oscars, it should be good enough for the country.

[AlmaKing]

May be intentional shenanigans by the republicans. Maybe somebody found cajones and pulled a dem trick this time around.

[TruthConquers]

I am happy for the citizens of Wisconsin. And it is disturbing in how many apparent glitches occurred in this voting.

But it has occurred to me that this might be a blessing in disguise. These numbers WEREN’T reported, so the dems DIDN’T KNOW HOW MUCH TO CHEAT. Was this on purpose? I don’t know. It is interesting to consider that if this hadn’t happened, would the dems won?

[factmart]

listen it might have been done on purpose, to take out dems cheating!

[JRochelle]

I was on the thread where we were keeping tabs of the results on Tues. eve.
This county was listed as not reporting a lot of precincts for a long time and then all of a sudden the AP was saying that all had reported and yet there was no change in the numbers. This should have been spotted then!