Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

General: U.S. may consider troops in Libya
cBSnews ^

Posted on 04/07/2011 1:35:55 PM PDT by tsowellfan

General: U.S. may consider troops in Libya

Army Gen. Carter Ham says ground forces wouldn't be ideal, but may be a possible way to aid rebels; Says current operation largely stalemated

(CBS/AP) WASHINGTON - The United States may consider sending troops into Libya with a possible international ground force that could aid the rebels, according to the general who led the military mission until NATO took over.

Army Gen. Carter Ham also told lawmakers Thursday that added American participation would not be ideal, and ground troops could erode the international coalition and make it more difficult to get Arab support for operations in Libya.

Ham said the operation was largely stalemated now and was more likely to remain that way since America has transferred control to NATO.

Complete coverage: Anger in the Arab World

He said NATO has done an effective job in an increasingly complex combat situation. But he noted that, in a new tactic, Muammar Qaddafi's forces are making airstrikes more difficult by staging military forces and vehicles near civilian areas such as schools and mosques.

The use of an international ground force is a possible plan to bolster rebels fighting forces loyal to the Libyan leader, Ham said at a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing.

Asked if the U.S. would provide troops, Ham said, "I suspect there might be some consideration of that. My personal view at this point would be that that's probably not the ideal circumstance, again for the regional reaction that having American boots on the ground would entail."

Video: Ex-Rep. Weldon on Libya visit, Qaddafi meeting

President Barack Obama has said repeatedly there will be no U.S. troops on the ground in Libya, although there are reports of small CIA teams in the country. Secretary of Defense Robert Gates told lawmakers last week that there would be no American ground troops in Libya "as long as I am in this job."

Ham disclosed that the United States is providing some strike aircraft to the NATO operation that do not need to go through the special approval process recently established. The powerful side-firing AC-130 gunship is available to NATO commanders, he said.

Other strike aircraft, including fighters and the A-10 Thunderbolt, which can provide close air support for ground forces, must be requested through U.S. European Command and approved by top U.S. leaders, including Defense Secretary Robert Gates. Ham said that process is quick, and other defense officials have said it can take about a day for the U.S. to approve the request and move the aircraft in from bases in Europe.

Ham said recent bad weather and threats from Qaddafi's mobile surface-to-air missile systems hampered efforts to use aircraft like the AC-130 and the A-10 to provide close air support for friendly ground forces. He says those conditions contributed to the stalemate.

Since the U.S. handed off the strike mission to NATO, U.S. planes account for only 15 percent of NATO planes now doing those air attacks, Ham said.


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: gadaffi; libya; missioncreep; noflyzone; obama; obamaswar; operationreelction; quagmire; war; warpowers
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last
To: tsowellfan
Muammar Qaddafi's forces are making airstrikes more difficult by staging military forces and vehicles near civilian areas such as schools and mosques.

I can see the schools as being an issue but not the toilets mosques.

21 posted on 04/07/2011 1:56:31 PM PDT by Eaker (The problem with the internet, you're never sure of the accuracy of the quotes. Abraham Lincoln '65)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crosshairs

They are strangely silent.


22 posted on 04/07/2011 1:56:42 PM PDT by MichiganConservative (The birth certificate is not the only thing. His "autobiographies" were fictional and ghost-written.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hammer

From what I have seen, the rebels would make the Keystone Kops look organized and our military would certainly help rectify the situation, but Not No but Hell No to our putting boots on the ground. Sadly, they are probably already there. OIF vet


23 posted on 04/07/2011 1:58:09 PM PDT by jesseam (Been there, done that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Publius

“Mission creep.
Happened in Vietnam.

Happened in Afghanistan.

Happened in Iraq.

Happening again.”

You forgot to add Somalia.


24 posted on 04/07/2011 2:00:49 PM PDT by sean327 (God created all men equal, then some become Marines!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: tsowellfan

Quagmire.


25 posted on 04/07/2011 2:39:43 PM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tsowellfan

I guess that’s why Hillary was out yesterday saying air strikes wouldn’t be enough.


26 posted on 04/07/2011 3:38:09 PM PDT by TigersEye (Who crashed the markets on 9/15/08 and why?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tsowellfan

I say we invade New Zealand..Or maybe Argentina... Just for the hell of it. Bomb them for a few weeks, then we’ll send in troops and news crews.

We’ll call it, “Operation why not!”


27 posted on 04/07/2011 3:44:02 PM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2

We go that far, just bomb Canada.


28 posted on 04/07/2011 3:45:09 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

s/b “Why go that far?”


29 posted on 04/07/2011 3:45:40 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: tsowellfan
Another invasion, but without a budget?

Using an unpaid military to invade a random country for no clear reason, without any public debate, all the while maintaining approval from half the country, is probably a great summary of the Obama administration.

30 posted on 04/07/2011 3:55:46 PM PDT by Steel Wolf ("There are moderate Muslims, but Islam itself is not moderate." - Ibn Warraq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tsowellfan

Operation reelection.


31 posted on 04/07/2011 4:57:11 PM PDT by NoLibZone (Impeach Obama & try him for treason / Homosexuals reject diversity / Unions finally caught for theft)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson