Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Some customers angered by SmartMeter opt-out plan [you pay to NOT play]
The Daily Californian ^ | 4/4/11 | Anjuli Sastry

Posted on 04/07/2011 8:45:08 AM PDT by Clint Williams

After being directed to create a SmartMeter opt-out proposal by the California Public Utilities Commission early last month, PG&E released a proposal that has angered customers who are frustrated with the high costs of disabling the meters, considering that they never gave their consent for installation.

The opt-out proposal, which was released March 24, allows customers to disable the radios inside their gas or electric meters with the option of either paying a $135 up-front fee followed by a $20 monthly charge or a $270 up-front fee followed by a $14 monthly charge to cover the costs of implementing the program, which involves sending workers to manually read meters. ...

(Excerpt) Read more at dailycal.org ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; Technical; US: California
KEYWORDS: optout; pge; puc; smartmeter
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last
To: in the wind
I am curious. How did they shut off your air conditioner without shutting off the power for rest of the house?

They have to install a load switch on your air conditioner. The load switch is controlled by the meter, which gets a signal from the power utility to being "shedding" (technical term) loads. Your specific house is not targeted. Usually, it's a particular area in the utility's grid.

41 posted on 04/07/2011 10:17:45 AM PDT by backwoods-engineer (Any politician who holds that the state accords rights is an oathbreaker and an "enemy... domestic.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Christian Engineer Mass; All
I see. And they could even pick who they turned off, if they judged that they were using more than they judged was reasonable. Nasty.

Not done in practice. Only disconnect meters are targeted specifically, and that is to turn off your juice because you didn't pay your bill. People, I know what I'm talking about here. Please turn down the paranoia knob.

42 posted on 04/07/2011 10:19:36 AM PDT by backwoods-engineer (Any politician who holds that the state accords rights is an oathbreaker and an "enemy... domestic.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom
Couldn’t this be defeated with a fifty-cent Faraday shield?

You do that, and the utility company is going to roll a truck to find out why your meter isn't reading. They find you sabotaged it, and you may find yourself with a summons; utility fraud is a felony.

43 posted on 04/07/2011 10:22:03 AM PDT by backwoods-engineer (Any politician who holds that the state accords rights is an oathbreaker and an "enemy... domestic.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Clint Williams
The federal government cancer has metastasized.

Surgical removal is indicated.

44 posted on 04/07/2011 10:22:28 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("...crush the bourgeoisie... between the millstones of taxation and inflation." --Vladimir Lenin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Selene

Is that a phenomena of the south? Living in a northern clime I’ve never hear of such a thing. The power company access rights end at the meter socket here.


45 posted on 04/07/2011 10:22:58 AM PDT by in the wind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Clint Williams
The right to privacy only applies to abortion.
46 posted on 04/07/2011 10:25:24 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("...crush the bourgeoisie... between the millstones of taxation and inflation." --Vladimir Lenin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

I talk to a lot of people who have their bills double after the smart meters were installed.


47 posted on 04/07/2011 10:26:10 AM PDT by troy McClure
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: backwoods-engineer

Yeah I think people realize it’s not done in practice. But with the way things are going, how many more years before it is like that? 10? 20?


48 posted on 04/07/2011 10:26:19 AM PDT by Christian Engineer Mass (25ish Cambridge MA grad student. Many conservative Christians my age out there? __ Click my name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: wita
There is a whole lot more to smart meters than you have in your comment. If it were only long distance meter reading, the issues would be far less, However it does put people out of work, and the initial expense of changing to new meters isn’t cheap.

Automobiles put buggy whip workers out of work, too. Geez. Luddies on FR?

Electric meters have to be changed out every few years anyway. They get out of calibration. Might as well go back with a smart meter, because companies like mine make that attractive. You see, we hate manufacturing the old "spinny disk" electromechanical meters. We want to go to all-electronic meters. Not only do our customers (the utilities) love them, it's good for us, too, because we can improve accuracy and make more money on them.

Please don't tell me you think us making money is evil. It pays my salary and that of 2,000 others.

49 posted on 04/07/2011 10:27:14 AM PDT by backwoods-engineer (Any politician who holds that the state accords rights is an oathbreaker and an "enemy... domestic.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: backwoods-engineer
The treatment I am talking about, aside from the smart meters, is: the "opt-out proposal allows customers to disable the radios inside their gas or electric meters with the option of either paying a $135 up-front fee followed by a $20 monthly charge or a $270 up-front fee followed by a $14 monthly charge to cover the costs of implementing the program, which involves sending workers to manually read meters. ..." This should be an opt-in. This is probably gouging, it IS totalitarian, and it is outrageous.

And it is horrendously bad marketing and messaging. No wonder people are angry. If it is as simple and wonderful and convenient as you claim, it could have been sold to consumers as an advantage, or in a way that shows they are offering a discount for participation; instead the utility is cramming it down people's throats. Stick with engineering, public policy and marketing obviously aren't your strong points.

50 posted on 04/07/2011 10:29:49 AM PDT by La Lydia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

Really? They installed radios on a copper interface with your house that delivers power? A clever grasshopper could have used the already available copper path to transmit the telemetry back to the Mother Ship without using radio frequencies. No messing with the FCC for reserving free transmission bandwidth and limits on transmitter power to boot. Instead they are making available to anyone interested their customer’s data never know the data has been compromised.

Good plan!

The NappyOne


51 posted on 04/07/2011 10:33:39 AM PDT by NappyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: USMCPOP
"The whole point of the new meters was better management of power and eliminating the need to send meter readers (who were bitched at, shot at, attacked by dogs, etc)."

What you said is true, but not the whole point by any means. What they really want to do is have a sliding pay scale for their power. If they have to turn on the old gas boilers or buy their power during peak hours from out-of-state generation then they want to know how much you use WHEN you use it so they can adjust your KPH charge accordingly.

Also what they want more that the meters is the ability to control your air conditioning and hot water tank thermostat (if electric) so they can shut down literally millions of them at their convenience during peak hours or the day. This will lower their dependence on purchasing power from other producers which is not nearly as profitable as generating all they need with what they have, keeping the higher profit margin in-house and not giving it to their competitors.

52 posted on 04/07/2011 10:41:14 AM PDT by Abathar (Proudly posting without reading the article carefully since 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: backwoods-engineer
Very few smart meters my company ships have the ability to control anything except our load switches, and our partnering companies'. There is not some magic zot beam that can turn appliances off at will. Even the Zigbee Power Profile meters from my company and our competitors can't control just any and every appliance.

I just switched to fiber internet, provided by the local electric provider. When they installed the fiber, they also changed out the watthour meter for a new electronic design that is tied to the fiber for the purpose of communication. I don't know if it's a smart meter, a dumb meter, or what, but as it stands now, my bill is still based on monthly KWH readings presumably provided by the meter directly to the utility.

It is rumored that we will soon have time-of-use rates made available as an alternative, but right now, that isn't an option. Load-controlling isn't an option here at this time either, though that could be a future option as well.

Given that my 3-ton AC could barely keep the house below 80 when it was 100 outside last summer, I don't think that I would choose to allow direct control of my HVAC by the utility.

BTW, only Jim Robinson has a magic zot beam. :-)

53 posted on 04/07/2011 10:43:09 AM PDT by meyer (We will not sit down and shut up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: NappyOne
Really? They installed radios on a copper interface with your house that delivers power? A clever grasshopper could have used the already available copper path to transmit the telemetry back to the Mother Ship without using radio frequencies.

Geeee... uhhh.... why di'uh we thinkuh that.... we must be duuuuuuuuumm not "clever grasshoppers".

Please. My company does this for a living. We know the score. There are a thousand issues with power line carrier systems. You can get FAR more bandwidth with a radio system.

54 posted on 04/07/2011 10:47:22 AM PDT by backwoods-engineer (Any politician who holds that the state accords rights is an oathbreaker and an "enemy... domestic.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: meyer
It is rumored that we will soon have time-of-use rates made available as an alternative, but right now, that isn't an option.

Hit them on it, hard. There is a federal law that utilities MUST provide time of use rates. That is the carrot to get people to use load shedding: it saves you money.

55 posted on 04/07/2011 10:49:38 AM PDT by backwoods-engineer (Any politician who holds that the state accords rights is an oathbreaker and an "enemy... domestic.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Clint Williams

can’t these things be set up for one-way telemetry (send usage data to the utility) while disabling the Orwellian “central control” abilities coming the other way?


56 posted on 04/07/2011 10:52:01 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: backwoods-engineer
You do that, and the utility company is going to roll a truck to find out why your meter isn't reading. They find you sabotaged it, and you may find yourself with a summons; utility fraud is a felony.

Where's the fraud?

57 posted on 04/07/2011 10:52:52 AM PDT by Steely Tom (Obama goes on long after the thrill of Obama is gone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: backwoods-engineer
Hit them on it, hard. There is a federal law that utilities MUST provide time of use rates. That is the carrot to get people to use load shedding: it saves you money.

We all know how that one plays out. People start becoming more efficient and using less. But the utilities have the same fixed overhead costs for union labor and such, and eventually they have to raise rates to compensate. (just happened with the water company where I live...too many efficient toilets and dishwashers, dontcha know)
58 posted on 04/07/2011 10:54:27 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: La Lydia
instead the utility is cramming it down people's throats. Stick with engineering, public policy and marketing obviously aren't your strong points.

KMA. I never said they were! Engineers make sure your power comes on when you flip the switch, and make sure your turds go down the pipes. You should maybe appreciate that once in awhile. Public policy and marketing don't keep the lights on.

59 posted on 04/07/2011 10:56:26 AM PDT by backwoods-engineer (Any politician who holds that the state accords rights is an oathbreaker and an "enemy... domestic.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: troy McClure
I talk to a lot of people who have their bills double after the smart meters were installed.

Mostly those growing pot indoors. Doesn't affect your average user people.

60 posted on 04/07/2011 10:57:24 AM PDT by Doe Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson