Thanks for the reply as it helps me better understand your point. Your 4th paragraph on the Constitution as a contract with a “framework for liberty” is my personal view. I find the Constitution to be a rules of the road for citizens to measure their government against.
I understand how you draw the differences in approach that are rooted in the definition you used and how those approaches can be dangerous to liberty.
He gets down in the weeds of original intent v. originalism, we the people, consent of the governed, necessary and proper, commerce power, judicial review and a lot more.