[ransomnote]

Still trying, Red6? I explained in my post 34 why, after reading your post 30, your posts were not worth my time. You destroyed your credibility upthread and insist on having it back now? Skip!

[Red6]

In reality you don’t have an argument.

Thanks for clarifying that to everyone.

[Red6]

People like you cling to these events and you rally around them to make a point but lack all substance or rationale in how you throw ideas around and try to tie things together.

If you were anti Iraq war, Abu Gharib would have been your battle cry.

If you're anti Sarah Palin you might have latched on the AZ shooter event.

If you're anti gun you use something like Columbine.....

If you're pro choice, the Dr Tiller incident would become your rallying point..........

You only “feel” you have an argument and you “feel” affirmed through these events which also give you a sense in power in the debate even though you make absolutely no sense and much of what you argue are textbook fallacies: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fallacies

[Red6]

People like you cling to these events and you rally around them to make a point but lack all substance or rationale in how you throw ideas around and try to tie things together.

If you were anti Iraq war, Abu Gharib would have been your battle cry.

If you're anti Sarah Palin you might have latched on the AZ shooter event.

If you're anti gun you use something like Columbine.....

If you're pro choice, the Dr Tiller incident would become your rallying point..........

You only “feel” you have an argument and you “feel” affirmed through these events which also give you a sense in power in the debate even though you make absolutely no sense and much of what you argue are textbook fallacies: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fallacies