Posted on 03/30/2011 9:01:16 PM PDT by circumbendibus
Arguments in a lawsuit on Barack Obama's eligibility that has been percolating through the federal court system in California since the 2008 election will be heard at the appellate level in just a few weeks.
Officials with the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals today notified attorneys representing several dozen individuals members of the military, members of state government and even a candidate for president that oral arguments will be held May 2.
"I can't believe it, but after two years of Obama litigation, for the first time the court of appeals scheduled oral argument in [the] Obama case," wrote Orly Taitz, a California attorney who has litigated a number of challenges to Obama.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Many factions are derisively lumped together as 'the Birthers', ignoring this makes you look as incompetent.
Guaranteed win for Soetoro
Well then you need to separate yourself from the faction of Birthers who claim that Americans were prohibited from entering Pakistan in 1981.
A request for oral argument is shocking, knowing that it will invite a media circus (even without Taitz) given the eligibility vulnerability of Obama and hysterical stonewalling and lack of transparency by the DOJ to date.
Maybe Obama isn't so precious anymore?
This has a lot of information, including the suggestion Obama flunked kindergarten:
http://www.theobamafile.com/obamaeducation.htm
Important to keep asking questions. Someone will put the pieces together... eventually.
This explains all the NO SCHOOL RECORDS. SSN is bogus and possibly bogus birthdate.
This argument “offends the conscience” of this citizen and perhaps some justices on the 9th as well. Are the federal courts willing to roll over and allow a usurpation conspiracy to non-vet a candidate succeed simply because an electoral majority is obtained?
You assume I'm a Birther of any sort.
I believe it's all a political scam, a red herring, so Obama has his own "Vast Right Wing Conspiracy" as a means to belittle his opponents. I just want this off the table. The underlying issue of ensuring and enforcing constitutional eligibility is what's important. I subscribe to no theory and assume he's a "natural born citizen."
My irritation is that circumstances exist whereby a 21st century presidential candidate could create such an eligibility information vacuum and there could be no way to call his bluff. It's a mockery of the constitution. It's are a farce. These are games children play. The adults need to take away this political ploy from Obama and all future presidential and vice-presidential candidates.
'bummer went to school under the name Barry Soetoro. It has been reported that the reason his law licence was revoked was because he lied on his application papers to the bar, on the question "Have you ever gone by any other name?"
Does this mean the Dimwits have a choice between an ineligible Marxist or a thief Marxist who has a husband who is a rapist? Wow, I am impressed. /sarc
Wonder why Wookie Wide Load gave her law license up? Lawyers usually don’t do that.
Prove it.
Friend of Hawaiian gov says no bc.:
http://www.youtube.com/user/Bigone5555J#p/u/0/hvrb7YqdvxE
Both Obama’s are not licensed to practice law.
http://www.youtube.com/user/Bigone5555J#p/u/1/HkjFc3S21nY
Violates bar rules to lie on the application. Barry didn’t give his “Indonesian name” when he applied. Also likely listed his false SSN.
The Ninth Circus will inevitably toss this case out.
“I believe it’s all a political scam, a red herring, so Obama has his own “Vast Right Wing Conspiracy” as a means to belittle his opponents”
Exactly
And the Trump entry into the Birther foray makes that theory all the more plausible.
Enter the GOP race as a Birther, draw other candidates into the Birther Camp and increase the likelihood that a Birther gets the nomination..
http://www.punahou.edu/page.cfm?p=1786
“Years Attended Punahou
1971 (5th grade) to 1979 (12th grade)”
How can ONE life has so many discrepancies?
Prove what?
“I hope some day ‘Natural Born Citizen’ gets defined finally by SCOTUS as “Two US born parents have a child on US Soil. Said child is a Natural Born Citizen.” There, simple.”
Your heart and mind is in the right place, just one small correction.....
The parents must be citizens, ie either born or naturalized, not “US born parents” as you post states.
Small thing, but the devil is always in the details......
What you posted.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.