I didn't do that.
I'm pointing out they agreed with the-now-banned-troll-pissant on Duncan Hunter.
If you look the last post from them to me, they're saying I *called them* pissant; and now you're making the same accusation.
Note that I was courteous enough to reply to them -- calling them on the attempted strawman, and then asking (again) if they can show that their support for Hunter has been consistent.
You're either posting without reading (at best) or lying through your teeth (at worst).
One is the mark of carelessness or excitement; the other, the mark of a troll.
The fact that *TWO* anti-Palin-Posters in a row come up with the same demonstrably false accusation against me within a couple of minutes, lends support to "troll".
But, I'll gladly watch your next few posts before making up my mind.
Cheers!
Yeah. You did. True or false:
Did you post this? "I found LowOil... here and here, where he reveals himself as a Duncan Hunter zombie."
Did you not link to two posts by LowOil (NOT pissant)?
In those two posts, did LowOil not make supportive comments about CONSERVATIVE congresscritter, Duncan Hunter?
As I said, there was nothing "zombie-ish" about his quotes.
And now you call me a liar? You're a real piece of work.