Posted on 03/30/2011 8:45:50 PM PDT by curth
ITBZ
That would be her call. Would I like her to run? You betcha! But I don’t think she’s going to. But no way will I support Romney.
NO! If you really believe all that stuff, why are you not demanding that she run in 2012?? Wouldnt that be that her moral and patriotic duty? Do you really have that little faith in her?
Yes, I know how you feel there.
You would have thought that after Bush and McCain disasters Republicans would have learned better. On the bright side it looks like Bachmann will run (hopefully) and if so can hand Romney's head back to him in any debates.
Thanks, VR. :)
Why bother?
Good point.
The Palin detractors have not (at least, the PDS-infected ones have not) posted as detailed a description and/or defense of their preferred candidate as I just did of Sarah.
Why are you moving the goalposts on me?
Cheers!
In response to your fine post, here’s one I did some days back: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2695412/posts?page=130#130
Preferred candidate?? You write like you heard her announce her candidacy. The rest of the world doest hear a peep of that subject out of her. If she is so important to you why don't you tell her that she has to run or else? Isn't her decision more critical to you than a few PDSers that you spend so much time with? You act like her decision is irrelevant but these other anonymous folks are the key.
Well put!
Presumably, if those on FR who are constantly belittling Palin have a preference for a GOP Presidential candidate, they will be able to say so, along with their reasons for supporting that person.
IF they do not, in contrast to my earlier posting of my reasons for liking Palin, then it makes them look more like they are merely stirring up trouble.
As far as your challenge, relax. Palin herself has said that she would enter the race if nobody else sufficiently conservative to satisfy her standards jumped in.
That might be Bachmann, it might not; it might be Cain, it might not.
I'm willing to give Sarah time -- the sooner she declares in advance of the RINOs, the more time the RINOs and Dems will have to tag-team her.
Cheers!
What?? Sounds like you are saying Cain or Bachmann could be a better candidate than Palin. Isnt that Pissant’s line? Do we need Palin or not? After all your rather aggressive posting efforts for her candidicy the past two years you would let her just walk away for her personal reasons? Something doesnt smell right.
It will be *Sarah*'s determination whether or not she feels that Bachmann or Cain are conservative enough that she, Sarah Palin, not enter the presidential race officially.
I chose to mention those two since they are the two most recently in-the-news strong conservatives who have been making noises about running.
Nice try, though.
Cheers!
;-)
This thread wasn't the easiest thread to find, but I remember it distinctly. I made a bet with one of you via Freepmail (land or grey, can't remember) that Palin would not run because she had too much baggage. Either one of you want to admit I was right now. Yeah, didn't think so.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.