Skip to comments.
Teen suspended for outing porn star school secretary
Toronto Star ^
| 3/26/11
| Star wire services
Posted on 03/30/2011 5:31:32 AM PDT by Roberts
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 next last
To: Old Teufel Hunden
Her face may not be the most feminine in the world, but look at her small waist. No guy in the world can fake an hourglass like that. Definitely a woman.
21
posted on
03/30/2011 5:57:57 AM PDT
by
library user
(Just because you're homeless doesn't mean you're lazy.)
To: capydick
22
posted on
03/30/2011 6:00:54 AM PDT
by
Crawdad
To: library user
23
posted on
03/30/2011 6:02:13 AM PDT
by
Mad Dawg
(Oh Mary, conceived without sin, pray for us who have recourse to thee.)
To: library user
Yeah, but you’d have to peel yourself off it with a putty knife.
24
posted on
03/30/2011 6:03:02 AM PDT
by
edpc
(Tagline under construction: Your American Recovery and Reinvestment Act dollars at work.)
To: Hacklehead
“... fake facebook page in someone’s name and posting racy pics of them without permission...”
IMHO, he shouldn’t have created a fake facebook page. However, the racy pictures are out there for everyone and anyone to see. She was/is a porn star. What sort of privacy did she truly expect? The suspension, IMHO, is a result of bringing attention to the fact that she was working with a school system and around children. The school decided to punish the kid for bringing this to light.
To: Hacklehead
IMO creating a fake facebook page in someones name and posting racy pics of them without permission is a suspendable offense. The kid is a jerk.Is it? I'm not sure unless the kid signed some sort of "Code of Conduct" policy. Might be a criminal offense, though. Akin to identity theft?
26
posted on
03/30/2011 6:05:07 AM PDT
by
Tallguy
(Received a fine from the NFL for a helmet-to-helmet hit.)
To: tx_eggman
She’s the archetypal butter face...
27
posted on
03/30/2011 6:08:03 AM PDT
by
Joe 6-pack
(Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
To: Mad Dawg
Either Jim or John had a like button on every thread some time ago. I forget why it was removed, though.
Getting back to the sofa though, it just looks like a sofa you’d see in a CLASSY, SOPHISTICATED porn from the late 80s or early 90s.
This was back when the directors actually paid attention to the type(s) of furniture in porn. Not to mention attention-to-detail in regards to color-coordination in scenes, etc.
Nowadays porn is just about the sex, which is why I stopped watching it long ago.
28
posted on
03/30/2011 6:12:43 AM PDT
by
library user
(Just because you're homeless doesn't mean you're lazy.)
To: Roberts
"14-year-old alleged..." "after authorities learned a student had spotted her in the porn video Serial Abusers 2." "the board said her cinematic activities dont correspond with the values being taught at the school,"
hmmmm, case of the missing parent...magritte
29
posted on
03/30/2011 6:13:36 AM PDT
by
magritte
("There are moments, Jeeves, when one asks oneself "Do trousers matter?")
To: Joe 6-pack
It’s amazing how many people I’ve talked to who have never even heard the term “butterface” and therefore have no idea what it means.
I think a lot of studies have been conducted over the years which indicate that men would rather have a girlfriend/wife who has a femininely figure, even with a “butterface” vs. a super cute-faced girl with a stick figure.
It’s all about how fertile she looks and if she appears to have a child-bearing figure.
In our society, a child-bearing figure will attract many, many more men than a super-skinny woman with no hips.
30
posted on
03/30/2011 6:17:14 AM PDT
by
library user
(Just because you're homeless doesn't mean you're lazy.)
To: library user
"IMO, just in case shes reading this, Id like to point out that you have as good a body as a 25-year-old (except for your hands, which Ill give you a pass on). :O)"
Man Hands?
To: library user
I imagine that — in Canada — that is what passes for a sexy woman.
32
posted on
03/30/2011 6:22:58 AM PDT
by
BenLurkin
(This post is not a statement of fact. It is merely a personal opinion -- or humor -- or both)
To: library user
I’d vote “Guilty with an explanation”.
33
posted on
03/30/2011 6:24:04 AM PDT
by
PzLdr
("The Emperor is not as forgiving as I am" - Darth Vader)
To: library user
To: PzLdr
If she’s a Porn “Star”, why does she need a second job?
35
posted on
03/30/2011 6:39:23 AM PDT
by
massgopguy
(I owe everything to George Bailey)
To: library user
"Getting back to the sofa though, it just looks like a sofa youd see in a CLASSY, SOPHISTICATED porn from the late 80s or early 90s....This was back when the directors actually paid attention to the type(s) of furniture in porn." In other words, it has a floral pattern so the stains aren't quite so obvious.
36
posted on
03/30/2011 6:41:58 AM PDT
by
Joe 6-pack
(Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
To: library user
37
posted on
03/30/2011 6:42:00 AM PDT
by
dangerdoc
(see post #6)
To: Astronaut
There are other pictures, these are the best looking ones. There are a few of her in ‘action’ too, unfortunately
38
posted on
03/30/2011 6:44:25 AM PDT
by
enraged
To: library user
Soak your hand in boiling denatured alcohol before you touch anything else in your office.
To: Roberts
Why are people who work in porn always referred to as porn STARS? Really?
What about porn extra? Porn character actor? Porn actor?
It's always STAR, like they're instantly recognizable and get Oscars or something.
40
posted on
03/30/2011 6:51:09 AM PDT
by
Lizavetta
(You get what you tolerate)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson