Posted on 03/29/2011 1:56:02 PM PDT by Berlin_Freeper
GO TRUMP!
I think you mean Barak Barack Barry Hussein Soetero Soebarkah Dunham Obama, Jr. II Davis.
I thought your qustion was serious. But now I see it was suppose to be an answer to my question about birthers.
I tend to think that Obama mistakenly thought that Gadaffy would step down at Obama’s demand. I think Obama’s ego grew so big after the Egyptian president stepped down after Obama called for it that he got cocky and thought Gadaffy would do the same. When Gadaffi did no. Obama was driven to war. That’s mostly how I think happened.
But I did send Trump an email with the following:
I never was one of those what some call “birthers” but my suspicions have
grown a lot since the beginning of this war in Libya. You may have
seen the video on YouTube where during the 2008 elections Qaddafi
practically endorsed Obama. Since then he had referred to him as his
“son”
This tells me that Qaddafi would have had enough interest in
this Obama guy to have studied his life to learn what he’s all about.
After all, he’s the President of the United States. Why would a
dictator such as Qaddafi not try to learn about the man in the White House?
A month before Obama started bombing Qaddafi - Obama requested an
increase to $1.7 million to give to Qaddafi for his military.
This was reported on Fox a few days ago. I have the link.
Why such a request? Was Obama blackmailed about something?
We know Qaddafi has a lot of power in Africa. And we know that if
Obama was born in another country (because of his fame) surely that
country’s leader would already know that he’s the leader of the birth
country of Barack Obama.
As the leader of Libya Qaddafi can find things out from other nations’
leaders. Perhaps he got information about Obama’s birth certificate or
even a copy and he tried to blackmail Obama. Or maybe Obama simply
knows that Qadaffi knows something.
Why else would a nobel peace prize winner go to war? And do against
the will of his own VP which was just reported on sunday.
It’s just a theory that came to mind. Two strange things:
One, a man (not just a man but The President of the United States)
cannot find his birth certificate who also happens to have grown
up in other nations and mosques.
Two, a peace nick so peaceful that he wins a nobel peace prize before
he’d accomplished anything to earn it. Won the election on his
anti-war stance, promising to never go to war unless it’s in the
interest of our national security and he had the permission from
Congress, the UN, NATO and everybody else including Pope.
So peaceful he scared the heck out of Republicans.
Yet this same guy goes to war with Gadaffi against the will of Biden,
without going to Congress as he’d always promised and quite frankly
Vietnam was justified. How is it this man could actually turn on a dime
so fast and coincidentally after requesting an increase of
foreign aid to Qaddafi himself a month before bombing him.
If Obama was born in another nation it’s guaranteed that nation’s
leader knows about it.
The Donald would never be Second Banana................
Very good.
This scenario is exactly why the ‘birther’ issue is not just fun and games. A leader who could be blackmailed by a foreign powers is a very, very serious issues for all of us in a very real sense. The issue of valid constitutional eligibility of the CIC must be resolved with no lingering doubts.
I meant to say: "frankly Vietnam was more justified."
When was T-ball invented?
It was a conspiracy of grand proportion. Eventually it took down TWO US Attorney Generals (the highest ranking law officer in the country) and many other officials at the highest level of government. Nixon was pardoned to ‘save the country’ but he would have been fried in an open courtroom.
Conspiracies are fact of life. Especially at the highest level. And they are not fantasy as many who post here what us all to believe.
Just like we must never forget 9/11 we must also never forget Watergate. Watergate told us that our government could be corrupted. In 1972 it seems it was for pure personal and political power. But in 2008 could the corruption be something more dangerous to the Republic?
Yes, I "believe Watergate happened". It was all over the news at the time. The Nixon administration was proven to be corrupt. Many high-ranking Nixon administration officials went to prison and of course, a disgraced Nixon resigned. I also believe that the Clinton administration was very corrupt but Clinton was slick and the media protected him, just as they now protect Obama by virtue of treating him him with 'kid gloves' and never examining any area of his administration that would indicate corruption. Glenn Beck seems to have taken on that job. At least until George Soros can get Beck off the air, which I believe he will. Hows that for a conspiracy?
Apparently, both you and poster 'RipSawyer' misunderstood my meaning when I used the phrase "I don't believe in conspiracies". I should have been clearer. I meant that, in the case of Donald Trump saying he's considering a run for the 2012 Republican presidential nomination then bringing up the Obama birth certificate issue (or, more specifically, the lack of evidence such a document exists) I was rejecting the proposition made in earlier posts that Trump was being 'used' by parties unknown to take on the Obama birth certificate issue. I do not believe that Trump is being 'used' and so, I reject the (conspiracy) theory that would justify that assumption. I think that Donald Trump is acting independently. Of course, I could be mistaken but until proven otherwise, this is my opinion on Trump and the Obama birth certificate issue.
For the record, I'm well aware that political conspiracies exist and are rampant, especially in elections. In a sense, the media promotion of Obama in 2008 and their willful refusal to bring any of his 'sealed' records to light is a form of conspiracy. That definitely includes the missing long form birth certificate. Not every conspiracy consists of a few people carefully plotting to manipulate events to accomplish what they desire. Sometimes, without any formal agreement, people can and do attempt to sway or manipulate public opinion or events to their desired end as happened and continues with the MSM and Obama, much to their shame and the nation's loss.
LOL, it is funny anyway
Whatever the registration rules for T-ball are, Hawaii probably has just as relaxed of an attitude about that as it does for birth certificates.
T-ball leagues has apparently been around since at least the late ‘50s. At first, I thought T-ball was just short for tetherball. Don’t laugh too hard! Girls weren’t expected to play in Little League when I was in that age range.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.