Posted on 03/29/2011 1:29:19 PM PDT by throwback
We're supporting AQ, Hamas and people who want to kill us to overthrow a man who for all intents and purposes was neutered by Bush.
Sure you don't want to rethink that?
+1
I was just wondering how we’ve managed to not hit a baby milk factory during the past week or two.
Read ALL of my post.
Thank you.
I was responding to a specific post of yours, not all of your posts.
Didn’t the admin say just a week ago that we were done launching cruise missiles? Maybe there’s an aspirin factory somewhere...
Colonel, USAFR
Still wrong. Try again.
I’m not referring to all my posts. Just the one you responded to. You stopped reading too soon.
Go back. Read it again.
I’ll wait.
“Money down the drain ... And helping Al Quaida to boot.”
Waste em so we won’t have any to help Israel when they’re needed. Sorry we’re out.
At over a million bucks a pop, maybe Obama will get to bankrupt the US totally before the next election.
No doubt he’d like that.
The list, ping
Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list
The MSM reporters would call these NATO-led coalition aircraft, so eager are they to cover for Obama.
Thunderbirds.jpg)
This isn't accurate. We are the part of NATO that does most of the work, but we aren't NATO. NATO is very inefficient and can't decide on anything. They really slow us down.
Obama has launched more cruise missiles than all the other Nobel Peace Prize winners combined.
________________________________________
I’ve got no problem with this. Throw as many bombs as you want. At Kadaffi forces. At rebel forces. WGAS.
It’s when Øbammie sends in the troops... THAT’s when enough will be enough.
______________________________________________________
Okay, I did. The fact of the matter is we’re supporting enemies of the US against daffy, what's yer point.
Read that again, we're supporting AQ, the MB against a man who is not active an enemy of the US.
You posted that you have no problem with that, that is what I commented on.
Why so defensive, I'm not trying to pick a fight, I just suggested you should maybe rethink your position.
Sorry to keep you waiting.
I’ve got no problem with this. Throw as many bombs as you want. At Kadaffi forces. At rebel forces. WGAS.
Yet, you keep trying to flame me for my support of Qadaffi? Where do you get that idea?
I repeat (in large font)
I’ve got no problem with this. Throw as many bombs as you want. At Kadaffi forces. At rebel forces. WGAS.
I was out last night when The One spoke- so missed it but scanned the live thread later- pretty much what we’d expect from this president.
I’ve taken a break for a couple of weeks- sometimes it’s just too much. To even think of putting our military at any risk for a mission that is largely undefined, that aids our enemies and was undertaken in consultation with the UN but NOT our Congress is SO sickening it’s hard to wrap one’s mind around it..
Flame you, I hardly think so...back off.
I approched you civily on one point, I read your post and got your point.
BTW, what does WGAS mean?
Perhaps you should follow your own advice....reread my original post.....
The rebels are slowly being killed off. That is what is happening. They take a town then will lose it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.