Posted on 03/26/2011 7:46:35 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
Every news outlet consistently calls them rich or wealthy instead of high income. There are plenty of high earners that spend every cent they make and then some, and are not the least bit rich.
I wouldn't be surprised if this "rich/wealthy" tag didn't come out of the Journolist. The liberals saw that the term "high earners" might bring to mind hard-working or highly intelligent people, and that there might be some political sympathy for those traits. Call them the rich or the wealthy instead and people tend to picture trust funders or fat guys wearing tuxedos and smoking cigars in their clubs as they check their investments in the WSJ. Much less sympathy for that crowd. I am certain that this incorrect terminology is intentional on the part of the MSM, and that they will continue to use it even though they know it is incorrect. They want these stories to have a political impact that favors libs and dems.
From 2004 to 2008, NJ lost over $70 billion in wealth because the “rich” left the state thanks to the onerous taxes enacted by democrats and then Governor Jon Corzine.
At the rate the financial services sector declining in New York City, we're soon going to be at the point where they only people who pay that "millionaire's tax" are going to be professional athletes, entertainers and maybe a handful of top executives.
Bump to the top. Would love to see what the Buchananite populists say about this.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.