Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/24/2011 3:42:03 PM PDT by Hawk720
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Hawk720

Mrs. Palin has already absorbed more crap than any candidate in history. She has little or no baggage other then what was “created” around her. Over saturation, yes, but still the best hope for America.


2 posted on 03/24/2011 3:47:38 PM PDT by elephantlips
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hawk720

“Their assignment is to draw the pus out of the Republican Party.”

Just who is going to suck the pus out of Gingrich? He’s got enough pus flowing through his body to fill up Lake Superior.


3 posted on 03/24/2011 3:48:26 PM PDT by bimboeruption (Clinging to my Bible and my HK.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hawk720

If the GOP doesn’t revert to conservatism, the GOP can expect to wither on the political line. Go Tea Party! The TP exhibits the spirit of our colonial fathers who won, with the help of Almighty God, our independence from tyrannical England. An absolute must read for all Americans: “The Light and the Glory”, by Peter Marshall and David Manuel. Amazon has it for your kindle.


4 posted on 03/24/2011 3:49:29 PM PDT by Paperdoll ( On the cutting edge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hawk720

THIS article is nothing short of despicable.


5 posted on 03/24/2011 3:50:00 PM PDT by MestaMachine (Note: I do NOT capitalize anything I don't respect...like obama and/or islam...but I repeat myself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hawk720

Newt on a bench with Nancy Pelosi.

I don’t want Newt near any election, especially Sarah’s.


6 posted on 03/24/2011 3:50:00 PM PDT by Horusra (The Democrat party is now the National Socialist party (nationalize the banks, socialize healthcare))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hawk720

Here we go again, more trying to pigeonhole Sarah in so the elitist candidate can be helped.


7 posted on 03/24/2011 3:50:39 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Luke ScottWalker - The Force Is With You)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hawk720

Oh, and Sarah is very electable if the RINO’s and the dems are so scared of her.

The big question is, can she overcome the primary fraud?


8 posted on 03/24/2011 3:52:03 PM PDT by Horusra (The Democrat party is now the National Socialist party (nationalize the banks, socialize healthcare))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hawk720

When did Newt become a giant? He faded years ago consorting with the left and the asylum. Now we are supposed to take him seriously?


10 posted on 03/24/2011 3:54:44 PM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hawk720

When did Newt become a giant? He faded years ago consorting with the left and the asylum. Now we are supposed to take him seriously?


11 posted on 03/24/2011 3:54:44 PM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hawk720

To paraphrase Sarah:

We need Gingrich like a fish needs a bicycle.


12 posted on 03/24/2011 3:55:27 PM PDT by Never on my watch (WTF happened to my country?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hawk720

What a crock! Palin, a gaffe machine? a scapegoat and punching bag? Sorry, this Bostonian doesn’t know a thing about Sarah Palin. This is a poor excuse for political commentary. He doesn’t understand that the TEA Party is not going to support a candidate just because the Republicans nominate them. The TEA Party achieved the victories in 2010, not the Republican establishment. This fellow won’t know what to think when the tsunami hits him.


13 posted on 03/24/2011 3:57:28 PM PDT by excopconservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hawk720
Gingrich = Scozzafava.

Gingrich = bull**** 3-word Twitter 'supporting' the conservative after Scozzafava pulled out & supported the dem.

I was there. I saw it happen. Gingrich is persona non-grata.

Gingrich is one of them.
14 posted on 03/24/2011 3:59:43 PM PDT by Christian Engineer Mass (25ish Cambridge MA grad student. Many younger conservative Christians out there? __ Click my name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hawk720
I absolutely adore Sarah and I admire her immensely for weathering the despicable storm the libs have thrown at her. She was ever graceful when they attacked her children, something I would not have had the guttural strength to do. I would have gone ballistic.

Newt certainly has his strong points and I agree with most of what he says, but the looney left will pounce on him for resigning his set and Speakership of the House.

If it came down to the two of them, I would go with Sarah 100%

18 posted on 03/24/2011 4:04:45 PM PDT by NWFLConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hawk720

POS article on every level.

Gruel for the PDS’ers consumption.


19 posted on 03/24/2011 4:07:19 PM PDT by Gator113 (I'll be voting for Sarah Palin, Liberty, our Constitution and American Exceptionalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hawk720
Possibly the GOP needs one of them or both of them.

Perhaps neither can win, perhaps one of them could.

But the guy who wrote this article is far too much in love with the sound of his own voice to be trusted about anything -- except maybe sucking the pus out of wounds.

Maybe not even that.

Anyway, it sounds like something he thinks about a lot.

20 posted on 03/24/2011 4:22:25 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hawk720

Ah, the kingmaker thing again. The problem with that is you need q plausible candidate for king.


21 posted on 03/24/2011 4:34:55 PM PDT by RichInOC (Palin 2012: The Perfect Storm.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hawk720

A Republican can’t win in 2012? Have you seen the numbers of Independents that Don’t support this “Kinetic Military Action”??? 68% “The Won” better get Hillary’s War wrapped up in short order.


22 posted on 03/24/2011 5:05:54 PM PDT by radioone (Proud to be an enemy of Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hawk720

Palin maybe, but Newt? Why?


24 posted on 03/24/2011 5:40:14 PM PDT by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hawk720
Gingrich is a hovering giant?

Spare us.

Any educated person who has taken the challenge of finding and pondering basic points in geography, paleontology, history, and logic, and then doesn't perceive that the whole we-control-the-climate premise is socialist fantasizing based in profoundly naive, essentially primitive ignorance, needs to rethink it in the context of time. Do the math.

Clamping iron control on the world's energy production and use in the sincere belief that it is somehow "saving the planet" is, to be polite, "quaint."

To be blunt, it's dangerously absurd. Worst of all, it preys on ignorance, and uses ignorance to foment fear, the same as stone-age peoples feared eclipses of the moon, only in reverse.

Gingrich buys it, apparently sincerely.

Give him the heave-ho.

25 posted on 03/24/2011 6:32:35 PM PDT by Finny ("Raise hell. Vote smart." -- Ted Nugent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson