Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Deaths Per TWH By Energy Source. (Surprise, Nuclear is the safest!)
Next Big Future ^ | March 13, 2011 | Next Big Future

Posted on 03/24/2011 11:58:47 AM PDT by PanzerKardinal

Comparing deaths/TWh for all energy sources

[...]with one new death that is somewhat nuclear energy related (a death at one of the japanese nuclear plants following the 8.9 earthquake) the statistics are not changed. Japan should have had sealed backup diesel generators or updated some of their designs.

However, nuclear still compares very, very well to the other energy sources.

The air pollution data is mainly from the World Health Organization and the European study Externe. The World Health Organization compiled peer reviewed health studies on air pollution from many institutions. Occupational health and safety statistics track the deaths of workers in the different industries.

Energy Source / Death Rate (deaths per TWh)

Coal – world average / 161 (26% of world energy, 50% of electricity)

Coal – China / 278

Coal – USA / 15

Oil / 36 (36% of world energy)

Natural Gas/ 4 (21% of world energy)

Biofuel/Biomass / 12

Peat / 12

Solar (rooftop) / 0.44 (less than 0.1% of world energy)

Wind / 0.15 (less than 1% of world energy)

Hydro / 0.10 (europe death rate, 2.2% of world energy)

Hydro - world including Banqiao)/ 1.4 (about 2500 TWh/yr and 171,000 Banqiao dead)

Nuclear / 0.04 (5.9% of world energy)

(Excerpt) Read more at nextbigfuture.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: eathquake; energy; japan; nuclear
After listening to everybody, I thought nuclear would be killing people left and right.

But surprisingly more people die falling off roof installing solar panels then die from nuclear reactors.

1 posted on 03/24/2011 11:58:53 AM PDT by PanzerKardinal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: PanzerKardinal

Thanks!! I was looking for just this information a few days ago and couldn’t find it. Good to have!


2 posted on 03/24/2011 12:02:22 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PanzerKardinal
But surprisingly more people die ...
... in the back seat of Ted Kennedy's car then die from nuclear reactors.
3 posted on 03/24/2011 12:02:57 PM PDT by oh8eleven (RVN '67-'68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PanzerKardinal

Proportionally, more people die from windmills than from nuclear. I’ll bet that that Don Quixote character had a hand in this.


4 posted on 03/24/2011 12:48:18 PM PDT by fhayek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PanzerKardinal

A quick google search reveals that despite leftist claims that as many as a million people will die as a result of radiation from Chernobyl, only 50-60 people have ACTUALLY died. About 80% (47 people) were workers killed at the plant in the initial accident.

So, had the Fukushima reactor experienced a Chernobyl-like accident, the Japanese could have (at worst) expected a <50 deaths — versus the 30,000 people dead or missing from the quake and tsunami. Yet as soon as trouble reared its head at the nuke plant, the MSM forgot all about the rest of the devastation in Japan.


5 posted on 03/24/2011 12:54:14 PM PDT by PENANCE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fhayek

On, Rocinante!


6 posted on 03/24/2011 12:55:59 PM PDT by PENANCE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson