Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kackikat

The dispute arises on the claim that one of the parties was unfairly removed as trustee(s).

You are assuming there is a state or federal law that would apply in this instance to determine any unfairness. I don’t think so; but if so, it is likely that would have been brought to the judge’s attention.

My sense from the poorly written article is that they have not yet had a hearing before the arbitrator. If that is true and the award is contrary to some state or federal law, then the disappointed party can be expected to appeal with a “void as against public policy” type of argument as one of their complaints.


26 posted on 03/23/2011 8:46:47 PM PDT by frog in a pot (We need a working definition of "domestic enemies" if the oath of office is to have meaning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: Kackikat

Excuse me, they did have an arbitration hearing and an award was rendered. It was in the first paragraph and I missed it.

So my last sentence in #26 brings us to where the parties are, the losing party took it to the judge and he found no basis for overturning the award.


28 posted on 03/23/2011 9:07:54 PM PDT by frog in a pot (We need a working definition of "domestic enemies" if the oath of office is to have meaning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson