Replies

A"s a business owner, you have conscientiously made the decision to disarm another person through coercion. You have also willfully made that person an easy target for a criminal. You have made a decision that will help a criminal perpetrate a crime against the person you have coerced into disarming themselves"

"Unless you can prove that the gunowner (who was a victim of theft) ASKED for his or her guns to be stolen, they bear NO responsibility."

Unless you can prove that a property owner asked a robber to come and shoot one of his customers or employees then the property owner should bear NO responsibility. Works both ways.

I have not coerced anybody in that situation. They have no obligation to come onto my property - if they don't like my rules then go to another person's private property who allows guns. There is no coersion at all.

The hell there's no coercion. As a business owner you are FORCING an employee or a visitor to become defenseless, all to serve your little whim for whatever reason.

Unless you can prove that a property owner asked a robber to come and shoot one of his customers or employees then the property owner should bear NO responsibility. Works both ways.

When the property owner FORCES people to become disarmed, that property owner is nothing more than an accomplice to the crime.