[dbehsman]

Oh, I'm sorry. Perhaps I didn't make myself clear. Let me put it to you this way.

Which is more important to you:

The Second Amendment rights of all Americans.

-Or-

The property rights of anti-gun bigots?



The property rights absolutists are obsessing over a totally bogus question. They are concerned about their property rights (while ignoring the property rights of automobile owners parked on their property at the property owners invitation) above the Second Amendment rights of the public who they have invited onto their property.

[circlecity]

I understood the question, perhaps you didn’t understand the answer. Both are equally important. And a property owner’s invitation can be accompanied by any legal condition they want to put on that invitation, including no guns. That does not interfer and abridge anyone else’s rights. IF you don’t like it, take your business somewhere else. Why do you think you have a right to impose your absolutist concept of gun rights on others to the detriment of their property rights? Nobody is forcing you to visit anyone elses property so why should you be able to force your guns on their property?