Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama's Letter to Congress about Attack in Libya
The Whitehouse ^ | 3-21-2011 | Barack Hussain Obama

Posted on 03/22/2011 8:53:28 AM PDT by Thanatos

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

For Immediate Release March 21, 2011 Letter from the President regarding the commencement of operations in Libya TEXT OF A LETTER FROM THE PRESIDENT TO THE SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AND THE PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE OF THE SENATE

March 21, 2011

Dear Mr. Speaker: (Dear Mr. President:)

At approximately 3:00 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time, on March 19, 2011, at my direction, U.S. military forces commenced operations to assist an international effort authorized by the United Nations (U.N.) Security Council and undertaken with the support of European allies and Arab partners, to prevent a humanitarian catastrophe and address the threat posed to international peace and security by the crisis in Libya. As part of the multilateral response authorized under U.N. Security Council Resolution 1973, U.S. military forces, under the command of Commander, U.S. Africa Command, began a series of strikes against air defense systems and military airfields for the purposes of preparing a no-fly zone. These strikes will be limited in their nature, duration, and scope. Their purpose is to support an international coalition as it takes all necessary measures to enforce the terms of U.N. Security Council Resolution 1973. These limited U.S. actions will set the stage for further action by other coalition partners.

United Nations Security Council Resolution 1973 authorized Member States, under Chapter VII of the U.N. Charter, to take all necessary measures to protect civilians and civilian populated areas under threat of attack in Libya, including the establishment and enforcement of a "no-fly zone" in the airspace of Libya. United States military efforts are discrete and focused on employing unique U.S. military capabilities to set the conditions for our European allies and Arab partners to carry out the measures authorized by the U.N. Security Council Resolution.

Muammar Qadhafi was provided a very clear message that a cease-fire must be implemented immediately. The international community made clear that all attacks against civilians had to stop; Qadhafi had to stop his forces from advancing on Benghazi; pull them back from Ajdabiya, Misrata, and Zawiya; and establish water, electricity, and gas supplies to all areas. Finally, humanitarian assistance had to be allowed to reach the people of Libya.

Although Qadhafi's Foreign Minister announced an immediate cease-fire, Qadhafi and his forces made no attempt to implement such a cease-fire, and instead continued attacks on Misrata and advanced on Benghazi. Qadhafi's continued attacks and threats against civilians and civilian populated areas are of grave concern to neighboring Arab nations and, as expressly stated in U.N. Security Council Resolution 1973, constitute a threat to the region and to international peace and security. His illegitimate use of force not only is causing the deaths of substantial numbers of civilians among his own people, but also is forcing many others to flee to neighboring countries, thereby destabilizing the peace and security of the region. Left unaddressed, the growing instability in Libya could ignite wider instability in the Middle East, with dangerous consequences to the national security interests of the United States. Qadhafi's defiance of the Arab League, as well as the broader international community moreover, represents a lawless challenge to the authority of the Security Council and its efforts to preserve stability in the region. Qadhafi has forfeited his responsibility to protect his own citizens and created a serious need for immediate humanitarian assistance and protection, with any delay only putting more civilians at risk.

The United States has not deployed ground forces into Libya. United States forces are conducting a limited and well-defined mission in support of international efforts to protect civilians and prevent a humanitarian disaster. Accordingly, U.S. forces have targeted the Qadhafi regime's air defense systems, command and control structures, and other capabilities of Qadhafi's armed forces used to attack civilians and civilian populated areas. We will seek a rapid, but responsible, transition of operations to coalition, regional, or international organizations that are postured to continue activities as may be necessary to realize the objectives of U.N. Security Council Resolutions 1970 and 1973.

For these purposes, I have directed these actions, which are in the national security and foreign policy interests of the United States, pursuant to my constitutional authority to conduct U.S. foreign relations and as Commander in Chief and Chief Executive.

I am providing this report as part of my efforts to keep the Congress fully informed, consistent with the War Powers Resolution. I appreciate the support of the Congress in this action.

BARACK OBAMA


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government
KEYWORDS: libya; obamaletter; warpowersact
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: Thanatos

NO WAR FOR BURKAS !


21 posted on 03/22/2011 9:49:35 AM PDT by American Constitutionalist (The fool has said in his heart, " there is no GOD " ..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: carton253

Have you never read the war powers act. If you haven’t maybe you should.


22 posted on 03/22/2011 9:53:08 AM PDT by org.whodat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Thanatos
Do you know the meaning of the word cherry-pick?

Now, that the whole Act has been posted... my summary (not a cherrypick of the act) was pretty accurate. The president has 48 hours to notify the Congress of military action. If Congress does not grant him a declaration of war, then he must withdraw the troops after 60 days...allowing an additional 30 days for withdrawal.

23 posted on 03/22/2011 9:54:14 AM PDT by carton253
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: carton253
False. Any honest reading of the War Powers Act clearly will come to the unalterable conclusion that one of those three prerequisites must exist before any action can be taken.
24 posted on 03/22/2011 9:55:51 AM PDT by TigersEye (Who crashed the markets on 9/15/08 and why?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: jaydubya2
"For these purposes, I have directed these actions, which are in the national security and foreign policy interests of the United States" ....

Interpretation : His approval ratings numbers are going down and he sees his re-election changes flying away unless he does something about the high gas prices ( temporally until he is re-elected ) so he will look good going into 2012.
25 posted on 03/22/2011 10:00:13 AM PDT by American Constitutionalist (The fool has said in his heart, " there is no GOD " ..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

Not false...


26 posted on 03/22/2011 10:04:00 AM PDT by carton253
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Thanatos
Allow me to translate the following gibberish into English:

"At approximately 3:00 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time, on March 19, 2011, at my direction, U.S. military forces commenced operations to assist an international effort authorized by the United Nations (U.N.) Security Council and undertaken with the support of European allies and Arab partners, to prevent a humanitarian catastrophe and address the threat posed to international peace and security by the crisis in Libya. As part of the multilateral response authorized under U.N. Security Council Resolution 1973, U.S. military forces, under the command of Commander, U.S. Africa Command, began a series of strikes against air defense systems and military airfields for the purposes of preparing a no-fly zone. These strikes will be limited in their nature, duration, and scope. Their purpose is to support an international coalition as it takes all necessary measures to enforce the terms of U.N. Security Council Resolution 1973. These limited U.S. actions will set the stage for further action by other coalition partners."

"I AM A TOTAL WUSS" - Barry Soetoro.

27 posted on 03/22/2011 10:07:30 AM PDT by Uncle Miltie (Allah sucks pig teat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: carton253
The constitutional powers of the President as Commander-in-Chief to introduce United States Armed Forces into hostilities, or into situations where imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances, are exercised only pursuant to (1) a declaration of war, (2) specific statutory authorization, or (3) a national emergency created by attack upon the United States, its territories or possessions, or its armed forces.

OK, what part of "only pursuant to" do you not understand? The entire text is posted above on the thread so show us what part negates the language of that absolute declaration?

The President in every possible instance shall consult with Congress before introducing United States Armed Forces into hostilities or into situation where imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances,...

Show us what part of "shall consult with Congress before" does not apply?

28 posted on 03/22/2011 10:13:30 AM PDT by TigersEye (Who crashed the markets on 9/15/08 and why?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Thanatos

Obama isn’t at the White House. He’s vacationing in El Salvador today.


29 posted on 03/22/2011 11:41:40 AM PDT by Hoodat (Yet in all these things we are more than conquerors through Him who loved us. - (Rom 8:37))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Thanatos
The real problem here is Obama’s ideology is that military force should only be applied to avert a significant humanitarian crisis; and then ONLY with the blessing of a coalition of nations.

When Americans are killed at random by terrorists, Obama does not believe that military force should be used in retaliation. To him this is not a significant humanitarian crisis.

This is why many Americans are likely to die under Obama, because the rest of the maniacal tyrants/terrorists in the world know this too.

Obama’s strategy is simply to “absorb” the attack. He has stated that. It is easy to say things like that when you have 24x7 security from the Secret Service. I guess it will be us peasants that will die in airplanes when they are shot down or blown up, or when the Islamic militant opens up with an AK in the local shopping mall.

Obama will do nothing.

30 posted on 03/22/2011 2:47:04 PM PDT by Gabrial (The Whitehouse Nightmare will continue as long as the Nightmare is in the Whitehouse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson